January SJCC

Cadet Men's Foil

Saturday, January 24, 2026 at 8:00 AM

Renasant Convention Center - Memphis, TN, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 CORTRIGHT Skipper 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 66% 25%
2 RAUTUREAU Hugo 100% 100% 100% 99% 95% 75% 34%
3 CHEN Matthew 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 36%
3 SISINNI Leonardo 100% 99% 90% 62% 23% 3%
5 WANDJI Noah 100% 100% 98% 90% 66% 32% 7%
6 GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas 100% 100% 98% 86% 59% 24% 4%
7 MAZAHERI Fletcher 100% 100% 98% 87% 59% 25% 5%
8 BIELER Mason 100% 98% 87% 60% 27% 7% 1%
9 ZHOU Chenqiao 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 54% 17%
10 LE Jacob H. 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 50% 15%
11 GULCHIN Mark (Yerma) 100% 100% 99% 93% 67% 25%
12 CHENG Logan 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 49% 12%
13 ZHANG Aaron 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 55% 17%
14 OZAWA Taishi 100% 100% 98% 87% 55% 16%
15 MORROW Brenden 100% 100% 98% 89% 63% 28% 5%
15 YOON Junhyeok 100% 100% 97% 83% 51% 18% 2%
17 GUTH Joseph 100% 100% 99% 94% 73% 37% 8%
17 CHUANG Oscar 100% 100% 99% 91% 59% 16%
19 CHANG Jonathan 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 46% 12%
20 NGUYEN Martin 100% 100% 100% 98% 81% 37%
21 SIMONOV Timofey 100% 100% 100% 97% 85% 56% 18%
22 TANG Alexander L. 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 76% 33%
23 YAO Bradley 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 52% 16%
24 RODRIGUEZ Tyler 100% 100% 96% 79% 46% 15% 2%
25 HART-SYED declan 100% 99% 93% 69% 33% 8% 1%
26 SHIN Noah 100% 99% 88% 60% 25% 6% 1%
27 ELKOUSY Zain al Din 100% 100% 96% 79% 46% 15% 2%
28 SHENG Dalton 100% 100% 99% 93% 72% 37% 9%
29 KAO Yi Li 100% 94% 70% 33% 9% 1% -
30 ZHENG Marcus 100% 100% 97% 86% 57% 23% 4%
31 RAJ Jay 100% 99% 93% 72% 39% 12% 2%
32 YU Kinton 100% 91% 64% 30% 8% 1% -
33 HAYES Stewart 100% 100% 99% 94% 75% 41% 11%
34 FANG Haoyu 100% 97% 81% 49% 19% 4% -
35 MARTIN Darius 100% 100% 99% 95% 78% 43% 10%
36 BAE Eugene 100% 100% 97% 86% 57% 23% 4%
37 WANG Elijah (QiChen) 100% 99% 90% 62% 27% 6% 1%
38 CHANG Eric Jonathan 100% 95% 73% 38% 12% 2% -
39 CHENG Mason 100% 96% 74% 37% 10% 1% -
40 YANG Steve 100% 67% 25% 5% 1% - -
41 LI Aaron 100% 100% 100% 97% 85% 53% 16%
43 WONG Jacob W. 100% 99% 90% 51% 14% 1%
44 LU Andy 100% 100% 96% 78% 44% 14% 2%
45 HOWLAND Jonas 100% 100% 99% 94% 76% 42% 11%
46 CHA James 100% 100% 95% 75% 40% 12% 2%
47 PAN Ethan 100% 97% 82% 51% 20% 4% -
48 LU Alex 100% 98% 87% 59% 26% 6% 1%
49 ZHANG Jacob 100% 100% 97% 83% 53% 19% 3%
50 BAI Austin 100% 98% 84% 54% 22% 5% -
51 CHOI Ethan 100% 100% 98% 85% 54% 18% 2%
52 HUA Aaron 100% 97% 80% 47% 18% 4% -
53 LI Lucas 100% 91% 62% 27% 7% 1% -
54 LEE Jaden 100% 99% 91% 67% 32% 8% 1%
55 PARKER Isaiah 100% 99% 88% 57% 23% 5% -
56 LIM EUNSEONG 100% 99% 88% 58% 24% 5% -
57 XU Nathan 100% 96% 76% 42% 14% 2% -
58 LI Daniel 100% 95% 75% 41% 14% 2% -
59 LU Hongyu 100% 100% 96% 81% 50% 19% 3%
60 RAUTUREAU Arthur 100% 99% 91% 69% 35% 10% 1%
61 SEIGEL Duncan 100% 89% 51% 17% 3% - -
62 MCKEE Calvin 100% 97% 79% 46% 17% 3% -
63 CAO Justin 100% 92% 60% 24% 5% 1% -
64 CHOI Colin 100% 96% 72% 33% 8% 1%
65 JIN Andy 100% 95% 70% 31% 7% 1%
66 ZOU Aaron 100% 95% 73% 39% 12% 2% -
67 KIM Daniel 100% 90% 59% 26% 7% 1% -
68 CHANG Jeremy 100% 88% 56% 22% 5% 1% -
69 LI Edison M. 100% 100% 97% 74% 31% 5%
70 GAO Andrew 100% 93% 64% 26% 6% 1% -
71 HICKEY Connor 100% 96% 79% 46% 17% 3% -
72 YANG Charles 100% 98% 85% 56% 23% 5% -
73 YANG David H. 100% 81% 43% 13% 2% - -
74 FLYNN Oliver 100% 41% 5% - - -
75 FAN Sean 100% 53% 14% 2% - -
76 TSUI Raedyn Ho Hin 100% 67% 26% 6% 1% - -
77 SHANNON Jack 100% 97% 82% 50% 19% 4% -
78 FUKUDA Brando 100% 91% 64% 29% 8% 1% -
79 MAZAHERI John 100% 61% 20% 3% - - -
80 MIRON Ioachim 100% 77% 37% 11% 2% - -
81 MAZAHERI Theodore 100% 17% 1% - - - -
82 HUANG Nathan 100% 81% 26% 3% - -
83 SONG Enoch 100% 57% 16% 2% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.