Cobra Challenge SYC/RCC/Y8

Cadet Men's Saber

Friday, November 29, 2019 at 12:00 PM

Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 70%
2 TONG ZACHARY 100% 100% 99% 91% 60% 19%
3 GRASS James D. 100% 100% 98% 86% 56% 21% 3%
3 MORRILL Justin 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 38%
5 NG Jonathan H. 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 34%
6 DENNER Maximilian P. 100% 100% 99% 91% 69% 35% 8%
7 NOBLE Colin 100% 100% 96% 81% 50% 18% 2%
8 WU Mengke 100% 100% 99% 92% 63% 21%
9 GINIS Nathan 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 60% 21%
10 TANG Albert 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 54% 17%
11 LASORSA Matthew 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 56% 18%
12 ETIN Ari 100% 100% 91% 60% 21% 3%
13 ZHOU Miles 100% 100% 96% 80% 47% 13%
14 LO Alexander 100% 99% 85% 46% 13% 2% -
15 GHAYALOD ansh 100% 100% 97% 83% 52% 20% 3%
16 WONG Ryan 100% 99% 88% 61% 28% 7% 1%
17 KIM-COGAN Ryan 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 27%
18 COLE Alexander 100% 100% 99% 88% 58% 22% 4%
19 YUAN Kevin 100% 100% 99% 90% 64% 28% 5%
20 BERMAN Luca 100% 100% 100% 95% 77% 40% 9%
21 YEN Preston 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 77% 37%
22 MENSAH Kennedy C 100% 100% 100% 96% 75% 30%
23 FENG Leo 100% 100% 96% 79% 44% 12%
24 WANG Andy 100% 88% 57% 23% 5% 1% -
25 ZHENG Edward L. 100% 100% 96% 81% 51% 19% 3%
26 ZHANG Jeffrey 100% 100% 99% 92% 71% 36% 8%
27 MORRILL William 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 46% 12%
28 HONG Steven 100% 97% 80% 46% 15% 2%
29 NOURELDIN Gabriel 100% 100% 97% 77% 36% 7%
30 SHOMAN Zachary 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 45% 11%
31 LEDERER Justin W. 100% 93% 67% 33% 10% 2% -
32 WOLFE-MCGUIRE George T. 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 51% 16%
33 FIELDS Matthew S. 100% 100% 99% 89% 58% 18%
34 SHIRPAL Oleksandr 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 64% 13%
35 STONE Esmond A. 100% 100% 98% 86% 54% 18% 2%
36 DENG Andrew 100% 99% 89% 62% 28% 7% 1%
37 RAUSCHER Ryan 100% 98% 85% 54% 21% 3%
38 GOLD Jackson 100% 95% 72% 36% 10% 1%
39 CLYMER Lucas Y. 100% 100% 96% 81% 51% 19% 3%
39 HO Kaden M. 100% 100% 95% 79% 48% 18% 3%
41 WU Wilmund 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 44% 10%
42 CHENG Kyle 100% 100% 95% 78% 45% 15% 2%
43 HUANG Tyler T. 100% 99% 92% 70% 36% 11% 1%
44 BOURGHOL Matthew 100% 100% 93% 66% 27% 5%
45 WEBER Mattias A. 100% 99% 85% 47% 13% 1%
46 LU Caleb Q. 100% 100% 95% 73% 33% 7%
47 KIM Shaun M. 100% 100% 99% 91% 61% 19%
48 LUTHRA Arjun 100% 99% 94% 73% 37% 9%
49 HONG Justin 100% 92% 46% 11% 1% -
50 KIM Matthew 100% 99% 89% 62% 29% 7% 1%
51 ZHOU Brian 100% 99% 91% 68% 35% 10% 1%
51 CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. 100% 96% 77% 42% 12% 1% -
53 SHAO Peter 100% 100% 94% 72% 35% 9% 1%
54 FISK Ethan 100% 99% 88% 60% 23% 3% -
55 OVERDECK Andrew 100% 85% 48% 16% 3% -
56 BUCHMANN Finn D. 100% 99% 92% 68% 32% 7%
57 SHTEYN Mark 100% 99% 93% 73% 39% 12% 2%
58 TRUDNOS Allen 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 43% 10%
59 REN Richard 100% 92% 63% 26% 6% 1% -
60 KAPLAN Liam 100% 100% 95% 70% 32% 8% 1%
61 MELIS Gabriele Nathan 100% 80% 40% 12% 2% - -
62 EPSTEIN Oliver D. 100% 97% 80% 46% 15% 2% -
63 HUANG Ethan F. 100% 100% 99% 93% 72% 34% 6%
64 MOLINARO Lawrence 100% 83% 46% 15% 3% - -
65 TSIGAL Edwin 100% 94% 71% 36% 10% 1%
66 HAQ Kamran R. 100% 93% 68% 31% 7% 1% -
67 QIN Alexander 100% 100% 98% 85% 49% 13%
68 BUCCINO George 100% 94% 54% 16% 2% -
69 MCCARTHY Gabriel 100% 99% 89% 53% 16% 2%
70 PANDEY Neil 100% 87% 52% 18% 3% -
71 LIU Mingyang Ryan 100% 67% 26% 6% 1% -
72 LEE Justin 100% 99% 89% 61% 25% 4%
73 OWENS Harrison J. 100% 94% 68% 30% 7% 1%
74 ZHUANG Rayken 100% 92% 66% 31% 9% 1% -
75 GEORGE Daniel 100% 99% 86% 52% 18% 3% -
76 YU Thomas 100% 94% 69% 33% 8% 1% -
76 GRYCIUK Koby 100% 79% 38% 10% 1% - -
78 HAN Daniel Y. 100% 92% 66% 31% 9% 1% -
79 COSGROVE Connor R. 100% 95% 72% 35% 9% 1% -
80 EDELMAN Seth A. 100% 99% 89% 64% 30% 8% 1%
81 DA GRACA Aidan 100% 98% 85% 54% 20% 3%
82 DEPEW Spencer 100% 94% 59% 19% 3% -
83 VAROQUA Tolby 100% 89% 56% 21% 4% -
84 LEMPERT Levy A. 100% 99% 91% 65% 29% 6%
85 RUDNET Noah 100% 58% 14% 2% - - -
86 DESHETLER Scott 100% 78% 29% 5% - - -
87 LEUNG Andrew K. 100% 86% 45% 13% 2% - -
88 SUSSMAN Jamie 100% 52% 10% 1% - - -
89 XUE ALEXANDER 100% 99% 92% 69% 32% 6%
90 LAMHAOUAR Ryan 100% 87% 52% 18% 3% - -
91 ZHENG Joshua 100% 27% 3% - - -
92 HUANG Alexander C. 100% 99% 88% 62% 29% 8% 1%
92 TISHININ Alexander D. 100% 98% 84% 54% 22% 5% -
94 YURT Vehbi 100% 30% 3% - - -
95 PIWOWAR Alex 100% 96% 76% 43% 15% 3% -
96 GILBERT Spencer E. 100% 24% 2% - - -
97 LIN Hadrian 100% 61% 18% 3% - - -
98 MACDERMOTT Rowan 100% 89% 55% 19% 4% - -
99 ZHANG Yankun 100% 57% 18% 3% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.