Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 70% |
2 | TONG ZACHARY | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 19% | |
3 | GRASS James D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
3 | MORRILL Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
5 | NG Jonathan H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% |
6 | DENNER Maximilian P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 35% | 8% |
7 | NOBLE Colin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 2% |
8 | WU Mengke | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 21% | |
9 | GINIS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 21% |
10 | TANG Albert | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 17% |
11 | LASORSA Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% |
12 | ETIN Ari | 100% | 100% | 91% | 60% | 21% | 3% | |
13 | ZHOU Miles | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% | |
14 | LO Alexander | 100% | 99% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - |
15 | GHAYALOD ansh | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
16 | WONG Ryan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
17 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% | |
18 | COLE Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 4% |
19 | YUAN Kevin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
20 | BERMAN Luca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 40% | 9% |
21 | YEN Preston | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 37% |
22 | MENSAH Kennedy C | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 30% | |
23 | FENG Leo | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 12% | |
24 | WANG Andy | 100% | 88% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
25 | ZHENG Edward L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
26 | ZHANG Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
27 | MORRILL William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% |
28 | HONG Steven | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
29 | NOURELDIN Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 7% | |
30 | SHOMAN Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
31 | LEDERER Justin W. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 33% | 10% | 2% | - |
32 | WOLFE-MCGUIRE George T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 16% |
33 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 18% | |
34 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 13% |
35 | STONE Esmond A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
36 | DENG Andrew | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
37 | RAUSCHER Ryan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 3% | |
38 | GOLD Jackson | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
39 | CLYMER Lucas Y. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
39 | HO Kaden M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
41 | WU Wilmund | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% |
42 | CHENG Kyle | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
43 | HUANG Tyler T. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
44 | BOURGHOL Matthew | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 5% | |
45 | WEBER Mattias A. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 47% | 13% | 1% | |
46 | LU Caleb Q. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 7% | |
47 | KIM Shaun M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% | |
48 | LUTHRA Arjun | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | |
49 | HONG Justin | 100% | 92% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | |
50 | KIM Matthew | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
51 | ZHOU Brian | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
51 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
53 | SHAO Peter | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
54 | FISK Ethan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 23% | 3% | - |
55 | OVERDECK Andrew | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | |
56 | BUCHMANN Finn D. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% | |
57 | SHTEYN Mark | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
58 | TRUDNOS Allen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% |
59 | REN Richard | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
60 | KAPLAN Liam | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
61 | MELIS Gabriele Nathan | 100% | 80% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
62 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
63 | HUANG Ethan F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 34% | 6% |
64 | MOLINARO Lawrence | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
65 | TSIGAL Edwin | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
66 | HAQ Kamran R. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
67 | QIN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 13% | |
68 | BUCCINO George | 100% | 94% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - | |
69 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 16% | 2% | |
70 | PANDEY Neil | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
71 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 100% | 67% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
72 | LEE Justin | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
73 | OWENS Harrison J. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
74 | ZHUANG Rayken | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
75 | GEORGE Daniel | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
76 | YU Thomas | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
76 | GRYCIUK Koby | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
78 | HAN Daniel Y. | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
79 | COSGROVE Connor R. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
80 | EDELMAN Seth A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
81 | DA GRACA Aidan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
82 | DEPEW Spencer | 100% | 94% | 59% | 19% | 3% | - | |
83 | VAROQUA Tolby | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
84 | LEMPERT Levy A. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | |
85 | RUDNET Noah | 100% | 58% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
86 | DESHETLER Scott | 100% | 78% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
87 | LEUNG Andrew K. | 100% | 86% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
88 | SUSSMAN Jamie | 100% | 52% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
89 | XUE ALEXANDER | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 6% | |
90 | LAMHAOUAR Ryan | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
91 | ZHENG Joshua | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | |
92 | HUANG Alexander C. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
92 | TISHININ Alexander D. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
94 | YURT Vehbi | 100% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - | |
95 | PIWOWAR Alex | 100% | 96% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
96 | GILBERT Spencer E. | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | |
97 | LIN Hadrian | 100% | 61% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
98 | MACDERMOTT Rowan | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
99 | ZHANG Yankun | 100% | 57% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.