Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Jessie S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 32% | 7% |
| 2 | LUNG Katerina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% |
| 3 | SHAW Kayla M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
| 3 | SADAN Jordan E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% |
| 5 | PEVZNER Victoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% |
| 6 | HUANG Natalie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 7 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 34% | 4% |
| 8 | EYER Hailey M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 9 | HECKMANN Emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 9% |
| 10 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 11% |
| 11 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 44% | |
| 12 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 81% | 40% | 8% |
| 13 | CHEN Jia P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 22% |
| 14 | YE Eileen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
| 15 | XU Madison | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 19% | 2% |
| 16 | XU Christine | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 8% | |
| 17 | ZHANG Yunjia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
| 18 | LI Meilin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% | |
| 19 | DAVIA Daniella V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% | |
| 20 | YU Lauren C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
| 21 | JANG Kimberley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 13% |
| 22 | LI Rachel Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 23 | LEE Bethany W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 17% | |
| 24 | YU Jaime L. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 25 | CHO Rebecca H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 26 | PERLMAN Talia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 27 | SHEN Lydia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 37% | 7% |
| 28 | BHAN Zala | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 29 | CHEN Kelly | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 7% |
| 30 | WU Celine | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | 1% |
| 31 | FU Qihan | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | SEO Irene Y. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 33 | HOLLE Aviella S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 34 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 7% | |
| 35 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 13% | |
| 36 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 6% |
| 37 | PAVE Claire | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 38 | WU Julianna Y. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | 1% |
| 39 | ORVANANOS Anice | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 40 | SU Michelle | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 18% | 2% | |
| 41 | LAM Victoria M. | 100% | 93% | 58% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 41 | LIU Sophia | 100% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | XIANG Emma | 100% | 100% | 87% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 45 | LENZ Zoe N. | 100% | 98% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 46 | WANG Ashley | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | WANG Chloe | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 48 | LIN Emma | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | MUSTO Isabella | 100% | 90% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | WONG Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% | |
| 51 | LOGAN Jade | 100% | 88% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 52 | KONDAMANI Anya | 100% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 53 | CHEN Jasmine | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 54 | FELLUS Talia E. | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 55 | SOLDATOVA Maria | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 56 | MI Anning | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 57 | DONG TianTian | 100% | 77% | 29% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 58 | CHARALEL Jessica | 100% | 80% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | HSIEH Rebecca | 100% | 84% | 38% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 60 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 100% | 68% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 61 | LEE Samantha X. | 100% | 83% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 61 | SLASKI Caroline O. | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 63 | BAKER-ROSENBERG Raynor S. | 100% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 64 | WERBACH Esther | 100% | 91% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 65 | KOSTOPOULOS Katerina | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 66 | HSIEH Sabrina | 100% | 10% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 66 | BHOGAL Sukhneet | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.