Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Jessie S. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% |
| 2 | LUNG Katerina | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
| 3 | SHAW Kayla M. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
| 3 | SADAN Jordan E. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
| 5 | PEVZNER Victoria | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 38% |
| 6 | HUANG Natalie | - | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 7 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | - | - | 5% | 21% | 40% | 30% | 4% |
| 8 | EYER Hailey M. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 9 | HECKMANN Emma | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% |
| 10 | CHEN Allison V. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 11% |
| 11 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 44% | |
| 12 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | - | 1% | 18% | 41% | 32% | 8% |
| 13 | CHEN Jia P. | - | - | - | 7% | 28% | 43% | 22% |
| 14 | YE Eileen | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
| 15 | XU Madison | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 16% | 2% |
| 16 | XU Christine | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 8% | |
| 17 | ZHANG Yunjia | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
| 18 | LI Meilin | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% | |
| 19 | DAVIA Daniella V. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% | |
| 20 | YU Lauren C. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 21 | JANG Kimberley | - | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 38% | 13% |
| 22 | LI Rachel Y. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 23 | LEE Bethany W. | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 45% | 17% | |
| 24 | YU Jaime L. | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 25 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 26 | PERLMAN Talia | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 27 | SHEN Lydia | - | - | 2% | 20% | 41% | 30% | 7% |
| 28 | BHAN Zala | 1% | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 29 | CHEN Kelly | - | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 30 | WU Celine | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 31 | FU Qihan | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | SEO Irene Y. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 33 | HOLLE Aviella S. | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 34 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 7% | |
| 35 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% | |
| 36 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 6% |
| 37 | PAVE Claire | 5% | 25% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 38 | WU Julianna Y. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 39 | ORVANANOS Anice | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 40 | SU Michelle | 1% | 9% | 32% | 40% | 16% | 2% | |
| 41 | LAM Victoria M. | 7% | 35% | 40% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 41 | LIU Sophia | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | XIANG Emma | - | 13% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 45 | LENZ Zoe N. | 2% | 37% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 46 | WANG Ashley | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | WANG Chloe | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 48 | LIN Emma | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | MUSTO Isabella | 10% | 39% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | WONG Sophia M. | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
| 51 | LOGAN Jade | 12% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 52 | KONDAMANI Anya | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 53 | CHEN Jasmine | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 54 | FELLUS Talia E. | 4% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 55 | SOLDATOVA Maria | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 56 | MI Anning | 5% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 57 | DONG TianTian | 23% | 48% | 27% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 58 | CHARALEL Jessica | 20% | 46% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | HSIEH Rebecca | 16% | 46% | 35% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 60 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 32% | 48% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 61 | LEE Samantha X. | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 61 | SLASKI Caroline O. | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 63 | BAKER-ROSENBERG Raynor S. | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 64 | WERBACH Esther | 9% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 65 | KOSTOPOULOS Katerina | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 66 | HSIEH Sabrina | 90% | 9% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 66 | BHOGAL Sukhneet | 55% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.