Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | GORIUNOV IVAN A. | D V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 2 | STRAUSS Luke | V V V V | V V V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 3 | ROSE-JONES Simon | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 3 | MARTINEAU ELIE | V D V V V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 5 | FENOUL Frederic | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 6 | LAI Boden | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 7 | WALLACE James | V D V V D | V V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 8 | TRAN Spencer | D D V D V | V V V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 9 | DOLMETSCH Max | V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 10 | MELCHER Jack H. | D V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 11 | BOUCHER Benjamin | V D V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 12 | DJONOUMA Toyohm | V V V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 13 | DOELEMAN Zeno | V V V V D | V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 14 | WILSON Ian G. | V D D V V | V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 14 | SONG Troy | V V D V D | V V D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
| 16 | KABA Elias | V D D V D | V V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 17 | HUANG Thomas | V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 18 | MICKEY Christopher J. | V V V V V | V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
| 18 | SANTOS Francisco M. | V V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 20 | BELLIVEAU Emmett S. | V V V D V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 21 | WANG Justin | V V D V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 22 | BAJAJ Nakul | V V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 23 | ZHENG Jason | V V V D V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 24 | FEINBERG James Y. | D V V V V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 25 | WANG-SONG Evan | D V D V V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 26 | RADZIKOWSKI Sam | D V V D V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 27 | SONG Changze | D D V V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 28 | WANG Zichun | D V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 29 | SPRINGER Elijah | D V D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 30 | SUH Aiden | V D D V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 31 | WANG Xiangdong | D V V D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 32 | ZHU Brady | V D D D D | V D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 33 | BRASSARD Calvin | V D V V V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 34 | NALLICHERI Ayaan | V D V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 35 | BONIN Leonard | V V V D D | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 36 | ROSIELLO Francesco | D V D V V | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 37 | OSHIMA Robert | D D V V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 38 | SANTOS Felipe | V V V D D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 39 | JU Bryan | D V D V V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 40 | WHITE Aidan | D D V V V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 41 | SMITH Troy H. | D D V D V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 42 | REELS Eric J. | V D D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 43 | NIXON-PERONI Micah | V D V D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 44 | LOPEZ-SIMPSON Victor | V D V D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 45 | YIN Chujun | V D V D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 46 | SKLAR Davida (Didi) | V D D V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 47 | HAN Nathan | D V D V D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 48 | SEILS Aether | D D V D V | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 49 | LIU Easun | V D D D V | D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
| 50 | RICHARDS Jack | D V D V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 51 | KOPPENHEFFER Rowan | D V D D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 52 | WILLIAMS Gavin | V D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 53 | STAFFORD Gareth | D V D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 54 | ROFINO Samuel | V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 55 | LIU Jeremiah W. | V D D D D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 56 | MANN Daniel | D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 57 | BENNETT Paul | D D D D V | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 58 | LIU George | D D D V D | V D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 58 | LIN Lucas | D D D D V | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 60 | BENNETT Nathaniel | D V D D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 61 | LEE Harrison | D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 62 | BARNES Kieron | D D D D D | V D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 63 | ACHILOV Murod | D D D D D | V D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 64 | CHAN Tyler | D D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 65 | BEAULIEU Edmund | D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 66 | BEEVER Logan | D V D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 67 | WIGGINS Keigan | V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 68 | ZHENG Yicheng Will | D V D D D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 69 | FOGEL Jake | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 69 | LI Alexander | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 71 | BENNETT Nathan | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.