Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | GORIUNOV IVAN A. | - | - | - | 1% | 80% | 19% |
| 2 | STRAUSS Luke | - | - | 1% | 19% | 80% | |
| 3 | ROSE-JONES Simon | - | - | - | - | 8% | 91% |
| 3 | MARTINEAU ELIE | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 53% |
| 5 | FENOUL Frederic | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 38% |
| 6 | LAI Boden | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 61% |
| 7 | WALLACE James | - | 1% | 14% | 40% | 36% | 9% |
| 8 | TRAN Spencer | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% |
| 9 | DOLMETSCH Max | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 40% |
| 10 | MELCHER Jack H. | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 77% |
| 11 | BOUCHER Benjamin | - | - | - | - | 19% | 81% |
| 12 | DJONOUMA Toyohm | - | - | 2% | 20% | 57% | 20% |
| 13 | DOELEMAN Zeno | - | - | - | 3% | 33% | 63% |
| 14 | WILSON Ian G. | 2% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 14 | SONG Troy | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 71% |
| 16 | KABA Elias | - | 3% | 24% | 45% | 25% | 2% |
| 17 | HUANG Thomas | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 78% |
| 18 | MICKEY Christopher J. | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 2% |
| 18 | SANTOS Francisco M. | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% |
| 20 | BELLIVEAU Emmett S. | - | 1% | 8% | 38% | 44% | 9% |
| 21 | WANG Justin | - | - | 5% | 27% | 50% | 19% |
| 22 | BAJAJ Nakul | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 37% | 8% |
| 23 | ZHENG Jason | - | 3% | 29% | 67% | 1% | - |
| 24 | FEINBERG James Y. | - | 7% | 34% | 47% | 12% | 1% |
| 25 | WANG-SONG Evan | 1% | 8% | 30% | 41% | 18% | 2% |
| 26 | RADZIKOWSKI Sam | - | 8% | 39% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 27 | SONG Changze | - | 4% | 41% | 46% | 8% | - |
| 28 | WANG Zichun | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 29 | SPRINGER Elijah | 4% | 26% | 48% | 21% | 1% | |
| 30 | SUH Aiden | - | 4% | 41% | 44% | 10% | - |
| 31 | WANG Xiangdong | - | 3% | 30% | 43% | 21% | 3% |
| 32 | ZHU Brady | 37% | 54% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | BRASSARD Calvin | - | 1% | 17% | 44% | 34% | 4% |
| 34 | NALLICHERI Ayaan | 1% | 9% | 38% | 46% | 6% | |
| 35 | BONIN Leonard | - | - | 4% | 27% | 58% | 10% |
| 36 | ROSIELLO Francesco | 11% | 40% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 37 | OSHIMA Robert | 1% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 1% |
| 38 | SANTOS Felipe | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 41% | 9% |
| 39 | JU Bryan | - | 2% | 19% | 42% | 30% | 6% |
| 40 | WHITE Aidan | 3% | 21% | 42% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 41 | SMITH Troy H. | - | 4% | 31% | 47% | 17% | 1% |
| 42 | REELS Eric J. | 2% | 21% | 48% | 26% | 3% | - |
| 43 | NIXON-PERONI Micah | 5% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 44 | LOPEZ-SIMPSON Victor | - | 7% | 37% | 39% | 14% | 2% |
| 45 | YIN Chujun | 1% | 7% | 29% | 43% | 19% | 1% |
| 46 | SKLAR Davida (Didi) | 3% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 7% | - |
| 47 | HAN Nathan | 34% | 47% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | SEILS Aether | 28% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 49 | LIU Easun | 49% | 45% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 50 | RICHARDS Jack | 11% | 54% | 32% | 4% | - | - |
| 51 | KOPPENHEFFER Rowan | 1% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 1% |
| 52 | WILLIAMS Gavin | 42% | 44% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 53 | STAFFORD Gareth | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 54 | ROFINO Samuel | 3% | 30% | 55% | 12% | - | - |
| 55 | LIU Jeremiah W. | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 29% | 1% |
| 56 | MANN Daniel | 11% | 50% | 33% | 6% | - | - |
| 57 | BENNETT Paul | 48% | 45% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 58 | LIU George | 59% | 37% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 58 | LIN Lucas | 6% | 31% | 45% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 60 | BENNETT Nathaniel | 21% | 52% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 61 | LEE Harrison | 21% | 49% | 26% | 4% | - | |
| 62 | BARNES Kieron | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | ACHILOV Murod | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 64 | CHAN Tyler | 26% | 46% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 65 | BEAULIEU Edmund | 36% | 53% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | BEEVER Logan | 47% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 67 | WIGGINS Keigan | 39% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 68 | ZHENG Yicheng Will | 61% | 35% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 69 | FOGEL Jake | 27% | 48% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 69 | LI Alexander | 71% | 26% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 71 | BENNETT Nathan | 21% | 57% | 20% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.