Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WOODWARD Connor | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
2 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 66% |
3 | LINSKY Matthew | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 34% |
3 | TONG ZACHARY | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 39% | 23% |
5 | FENG Leo | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
6 | GINIS Nathan | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
7 | WILSON Jude | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
7 | CHAN Matthew | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
9 | GHAYALOD ansh | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
9 | WU Mengke | - | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 37% | 9% |
11 | FRISHMAN Ethan J. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 25% | 72% |
12 | DENNER Maximilian P. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 41% |
12 | GUZZO Vito | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
14 | LEE Justin | - | - | 5% | 26% | 49% | 21% | |
15 | BERMAN Luca | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 33% |
16 | NOURELDIN Gabriel | - | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 6% |
17 | MORRILL William | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
18 | KIM Shaun M. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% | |
19 | HUANG Ethan F. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
20 | COLE Alexander | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 12% |
21 | WU Wilmund | - | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
21 | DENG Andrew | - | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
23 | SHOMAN Noah | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
24 | SIMAK Joseph P. | - | 1% | 8% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 8% |
25 | WANG Andy | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
26 | MYLEK Peter | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% |
27 | KIM Matthew | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 12% | |
28 | SHTEYN Mark | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 26% | |
29 | BONIFIELD Arthur G. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 43% | 44% | |
30 | WAXLER Seth B. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% |
31 | PANDEY Neil | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
32 | WANG Nicolas | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
33 | NOBLE Colin | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
34 | ZHENG Edward L. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
35 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | 1% | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
36 | HAN Daniel Y. | 1% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
37 | XUE ALEXANDER | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 39% | 15% | 1% |
37 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
39 | OWENS Harrison J. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
40 | ROBERTS Justin C. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
41 | HONG Steven | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
42 | CLYMER Lucas Y. | - | - | 5% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 3% |
43 | ZHOU Brian | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% |
44 | ZHANG Yankun | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
45 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
46 | BUCHMANN Finn D. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
46 | GIZERSKY Jared | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
48 | ETIN Ari | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
49 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
50 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | |
51 | OVERDECK Andrew | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
52 | ZHOU Miles | - | - | 4% | 22% | 42% | 28% | 4% |
53 | HO Kaden M. | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
54 | ZHANG Jeffrey | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
55 | ALTIRS Giorgio | 1% | 8% | 30% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - |
56 | LEE Aydan J. | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
57 | CHIN Matthew W. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 38% | 15% |
58 | LU Caleb Q. | 3% | 15% | 30% | 30% | 17% | 5% | - |
59 | FLOT Tai A. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
60 | HUANG Alexander C. | - | 2% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
61 | KOVACH Jonah F. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 34% | 8% |
62 | ZHANG Derek | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
63 | TONG Luke | 18% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
64 | ZHU Shao | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
65 | SHOMAN Zachary | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
66 | NG Jeremiah | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
67 | MOULTON Ian | 22% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
68 | STONE Esmond A. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 22% | 3% |
69 | WANG Robert | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
70 | MARGULIES William | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
71 | BREKHMAN Eric | - | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
72 | RUIGOMEZ Eduardo | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
73 | YU Thomas | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - |
74 | OH Triton | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% |
75 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | - | 8% | 38% | 40% | 13% | 1% | |
76 | CHO Winston | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | |
77 | TURCK Caspar J. | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 54% | 11% |
78 | CHTERENTAL Alex | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
78 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
80 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
81 | MEDVEDEV Michail D. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
82 | WEBER Mattias A. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
83 | GILSON Lucas B. | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
84 | SANDERS Samuel B. | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
85 | RODE Leon J. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 42% | 14% |
86 | FIELDS Matthew S. | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
87 | DEPEW Spencer | 2% | 19% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
88 | WU Richard | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
89 | PERRON Robert | 4% | 22% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
90 | MALONE Gregory D. | 1% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
91 | CHUANG Tristan | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
92 | PENG Bryan | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
93 | VAUGHN Jason | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
94 | CHENG Cody | 1% | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
95 | OKEEFE Mitchell | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
96 | CHAN Aidan | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
97 | HUANG Maxwell H. | - | 3% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
98 | SAVOY Luca | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
99 | GONG Jerry | 5% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
100 | TANG Charles | 5% | 33% | 40% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
101 | HUROWITZ Max | 3% | 18% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
102 | GAUVEY Kieran | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
103 | VOSS Jeffer | 9% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
104 | PIWOWAR Alex | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
105 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
105 | LIN Steve | 3% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
107 | DAI William | 33% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
108 | LAM Jeffrey Y. | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
108 | WANG Oscar | 4% | 26% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
110 | HU Christopher | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
111 | ZHANG Ethan W. | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
112 | WELLS Griffin | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - | |
113 | YURT Vehbi | 60% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | |
114 | ZHUANG Rayken | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | - | |
115 | DOWNEY Baran | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
116 | HUANG Connor | - | 4% | 32% | 45% | 17% | 2% | |
117 | REN James | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
118 | YEE Evan J. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
119 | SULLIVAN Aidan J. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
120 | LEONARD Charles | 4% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
121 | ONG Chinli | 17% | 43% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
122 | MEHTA Krish | - | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
123 | MAGNI Jesse | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
124 | ZHENG Joshua | 33% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
125 | SU Landon | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 2% |
126 | KESSLER Josh | 35% | 41% | 19% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
127 | LIU Lawrence | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
128 | SPRINGER Patrick | 32% | 41% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
129 | GAJDA Jesse | 22% | 58% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
130 | YEE Ethan C. | 6% | 37% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
131 | POSY Daniel | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
132 | CAMPO Alexander P. | 38% | 45% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
133 | CHEN Evan P. | 3% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
133 | MACDERMOTT Rowan | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
135 | SEN David | 51% | 42% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
136 | WEIL Asher D. | 25% | 51% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
137 | SHIPITSIN Yaroslav | 60% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
138 | CHENG Hong | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
139 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | < 1% | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
140 | HOTHA Nikhil | 13% | 43% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
141 | PILAT Matthew J. | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
142 | RUSSELL Clark | 62% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
143 | ZHOU James Y. | 8% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
144 | MAZURENKO Alexander | 25% | 51% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
144 | KULKARNI Rohan | 37% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
144 | GOLD Carter | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
144 | SUN Benjamin | 18% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
148 | GUREVICH Savely | 37% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
149 | ALI Rahman | 15% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
149 | IDRISSI Idris | 9% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
151 | JOYCE Cameron | 65% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.