Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WOODWARD Connor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 36% |
| 2 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
| 3 | LINSKY Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 34% |
| 3 | TONG ZACHARY | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 23% |
| 5 | FENG Leo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 6 | GINIS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
| 7 | WILSON Jude | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
| 7 | CHAN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
| 9 | GHAYALOD ansh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 61% | 21% |
| 9 | WU Mengke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 46% | 9% |
| 11 | FRISHMAN Ethan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 72% |
| 12 | DENNER Maximilian P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% |
| 12 | GUZZO Vito | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
| 14 | LEE Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 21% | |
| 15 | BERMAN Luca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 33% |
| 16 | NOURELDIN Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 6% |
| 17 | MORRILL William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
| 18 | KIM Shaun M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% | |
| 19 | HUANG Ethan F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 20 | COLE Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 12% |
| 21 | WU Wilmund | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 21 | DENG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
| 23 | SHOMAN Noah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 5% |
| 24 | SIMAK Joseph P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 8% |
| 25 | WANG Andy | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 26 | MYLEK Peter | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% |
| 27 | KIM Matthew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 12% | |
| 28 | SHTEYN Mark | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% | |
| 29 | BONIFIELD Arthur G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 44% | |
| 30 | WAXLER Seth B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% |
| 31 | PANDEY Neil | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 2% |
| 32 | WANG Nicolas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 2% |
| 33 | NOBLE Colin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
| 34 | ZHENG Edward L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
| 35 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 36 | HAN Daniel Y. | 100% | 99% | 81% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 37 | XUE ALEXANDER | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | 16% | 1% |
| 37 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
| 39 | OWENS Harrison J. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 40 | ROBERTS Justin C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 11% |
| 41 | HONG Steven | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 42 | CLYMER Lucas Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 26% | 3% |
| 43 | ZHOU Brian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 6% |
| 44 | ZHANG Yankun | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 45 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 46 | BUCHMANN Finn D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 46 | GIZERSKY Jared | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 48 | ETIN Ari | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 49 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 50 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% | |
| 51 | OVERDECK Andrew | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 52 | ZHOU Miles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 32% | 4% |
| 53 | HO Kaden M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 54 | ZHANG Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
| 55 | ALTIRS Giorgio | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 56 | LEE Aydan J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 57 | CHIN Matthew W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 15% |
| 58 | LU Caleb Q. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 59 | FLOT Tai A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
| 60 | HUANG Alexander C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% |
| 61 | KOVACH Jonah F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 8% |
| 62 | ZHANG Derek | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 63 | TONG Luke | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 64 | ZHU Shao | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 65 | SHOMAN Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% |
| 66 | NG Jeremiah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% |
| 67 | MOULTON Ian | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 68 | STONE Esmond A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% | 3% |
| 69 | WANG Robert | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 70 | MARGULIES William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 71 | BREKHMAN Eric | 100% | 100% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 72 | RUIGOMEZ Eduardo | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 73 | YU Thomas | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 74 | OH Triton | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 75 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 54% | 14% | 1% | |
| 76 | CHO Winston | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 8% | |
| 77 | TURCK Caspar J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 11% |
| 78 | CHTERENTAL Alex | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 78 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 80 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
| 81 | MEDVEDEV Michail D. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 82 | WEBER Mattias A. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 83 | GILSON Lucas B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
| 84 | SANDERS Samuel B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 13% | 1% |
| 85 | RODE Leon J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 14% |
| 86 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 87 | DEPEW Spencer | 100% | 98% | 79% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 88 | WU Richard | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 89 | PERRON Robert | 100% | 96% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 90 | MALONE Gregory D. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 91 | CHUANG Tristan | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 92 | PENG Bryan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 93 | VAUGHN Jason | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 94 | CHENG Cody | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 95 | OKEEFE Mitchell | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 96 | CHAN Aidan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 97 | HUANG Maxwell H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 98 | SAVOY Luca | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 99 | GONG Jerry | 100% | 95% | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - |
| 100 | TANG Charles | 100% | 95% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 101 | HUROWITZ Max | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 102 | GAUVEY Kieran | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 103 | VOSS Jeffer | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 104 | PIWOWAR Alex | 100% | 80% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 105 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
| 105 | LIN Steve | 100% | 97% | 77% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 107 | DAI William | 100% | 67% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 108 | LAM Jeffrey Y. | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 108 | WANG Oscar | 100% | 96% | 70% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
| 110 | HU Christopher | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 111 | ZHANG Ethan W. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
| 112 | WELLS Griffin | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 113 | YURT Vehbi | 100% | 40% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 114 | ZHUANG Rayken | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 115 | DOWNEY Baran | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 116 | HUANG Connor | 100% | 100% | 96% | 64% | 19% | 2% | |
| 117 | REN James | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | 1% |
| 118 | YEE Evan J. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 119 | SULLIVAN Aidan J. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 120 | LEONARD Charles | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 121 | ONG Chinli | 100% | 83% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 122 | MEHTA Krish | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 123 | MAGNI Jesse | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 124 | ZHENG Joshua | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 125 | SU Landon | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
| 126 | KESSLER Josh | 100% | 65% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 127 | LIU Lawrence | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 128 | SPRINGER Patrick | 100% | 68% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 129 | GAJDA Jesse | 100% | 78% | 21% | 2% | - | - | |
| 130 | YEE Ethan C. | 100% | 94% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 131 | POSY Daniel | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 132 | CAMPO Alexander P. | 100% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 133 | CHEN Evan P. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 133 | MACDERMOTT Rowan | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 135 | SEN David | 100% | 49% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 136 | WEIL Asher D. | 100% | 75% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 137 | SHIPITSIN Yaroslav | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 138 | CHENG Hong | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 139 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 140 | HOTHA Nikhil | 100% | 87% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 141 | PILAT Matthew J. | 100% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 142 | RUSSELL Clark | 100% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 143 | ZHOU James Y. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 144 | MAZURENKO Alexander | 100% | 75% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 144 | KULKARNI Rohan | 100% | 63% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 144 | GOLD Carter | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 144 | SUN Benjamin | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 148 | GUREVICH Savely | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 149 | ALI Rahman | 100% | 85% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 149 | IDRISSI Idris | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 151 | JOYCE Cameron | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.