Duke Energy Convention Center - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SEAL Julie T. | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 47% | 31% |
| 2 | BASSIK Judith M. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 3 | FEDDE Rachel A. | - | 2% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 3 | HENNIG-TRESTMAN Bonnie L. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 71% |
| 5 | MCGRATH Polina S. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% |
| 6 | BOGDAN Doina | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 7 | MADDOX Lacey E. | - | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
| 8 | FAGAN Margaret | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 47% | 32% |
| 9 | RANDALL Cathleen Coyle | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - | < 1% |
| 10 | PIERRYNOWSKI Kathryn S. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
| 11 | FERGUSON Diane F. | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 12 | MORRISON Monica L. | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 13 | SETHRE Traci | 3% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 14 | LAU-ALLEN Macy | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 15 | LIPPAI Sarah | 3% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 16 | ORLOVA Elena | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 17 | LEE Claire L. | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 18 | DRESSEL Pamela (Pam) A. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
| 19 | SELTZER Eve | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 20 | HUEY Sharone A. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 21 | SOBISKY Kari | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 22 | HERMES Kathleen A. | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 23 | GUNTRUM Pam L. | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 24 | GLUCK Myriam | 60% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 25 | STEVENS Joanne B. | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 25 | DE LA FOSCADE-CONDON Celine | - | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% |
| 27 | CHUANG Jocelyn | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 28 | CAWTHORN Muriel C. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 29 | ECKSTEIN Harriet A. | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 30 | MOORE Annette | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | ARANGO PINEDO Catalina | 70% | 28% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 32 | SHANKS Jennifer | 18% | 61% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 33 | BROWN Rachel (Rachel Brown) F. | - | < 1% | 3% | 16% | 39% | 37% | 5% |
| 34 | ROSENFELD Madelon M. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 35 | MORO Diana | 81% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.