Duke Energy Convention Center - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SEAL Julie T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 31% |
| 2 | BASSIK Judith M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
| 3 | FEDDE Rachel A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 3 | HENNIG-TRESTMAN Bonnie L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% |
| 5 | MCGRATH Polina S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 8% |
| 6 | BOGDAN Doina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 9% |
| 7 | MADDOX Lacey E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
| 8 | FAGAN Margaret | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 32% |
| 9 | RANDALL Cathleen Coyle | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | < 1% |
| 10 | PIERRYNOWSKI Kathryn S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
| 11 | FERGUSON Diane F. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 24% | 5% | 1% |
| 12 | MORRISON Monica L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 13 | SETHRE Traci | 100% | 97% | 73% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 14 | LAU-ALLEN Macy | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 15 | LIPPAI Sarah | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 16 | ORLOVA Elena | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 17 | LEE Claire L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
| 18 | DRESSEL Pamela (Pam) A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% |
| 19 | SELTZER Eve | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 20 | HUEY Sharone A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 13% |
| 21 | SOBISKY Kari | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 22 | HERMES Kathleen A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 13% | 1% |
| 23 | GUNTRUM Pam L. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 24 | GLUCK Myriam | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 25 | STEVENS Joanne B. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 25 | DE LA FOSCADE-CONDON Celine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
| 27 | CHUANG Jocelyn | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 28 | CAWTHORN Muriel C. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
| 29 | ECKSTEIN Harriet A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 30 | MOORE Annette | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | ARANGO PINEDO Catalina | 100% | 30% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 32 | SHANKS Jennifer | 100% | 82% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 33 | BROWN Rachel (Rachel Brown) F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% | 5% |
| 34 | ROSENFELD Madelon M. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 35 | MORO Diana | 100% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.