Duke Energy Convention Center - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | JAN Stephen | V V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 2 | WYSZYNSKI Marek B. | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 3 | TYSHCHENKO Andrey | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 3 | PAI Dong-Ying | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 5 | LAWRENCE John W. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 6 | HENNIG Thomas A. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 8 | BUCHNER William | D V D D V V | V V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 9 | PIMOUTKINE Roustam R. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 10 | CHO Michael | V V V V V V | V V | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 11 | JUNCO Carlos | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 12 | ZHANG Jie | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 13 | GREEN Michael C. | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 14 | ZHAO Zhiyong | D V V D V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 15 | POWERS Douglas A. | V D V D V V | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 16 | SHEYNKMAN Leon | V D D V D | V V V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 17 | LOPEZ Reynaldo (REY) | V V V V V V | V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 18 | FOELLMER Oliver K. | V V V V V V | V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 19 | GROSS Liran | V V V V V D | V D | 5.7 | 5 | -0.7 |
| 20 | TANG Julian | V V V V D V | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 21 | GEARHART Andrew (Andy) R. | V V V D V V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 22 | FLANAGAN James | V V V V D D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 23 | KISSINGFORD John F. | D V V V V D | V | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 23 | GONZALEZ II John L. | V V V V D D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 25 | WILLIAMS Kenneth H. | V V D V V D | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 26 | WU Clarence C. | D D V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 27 | HARKINS Craig T. | V V V V D D | V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 28 | PASHBY Stephen N. | V D V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 29 | KUZMAK Michael J. | D V D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 30 | RIFFATERRE Jason | V D D V V D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 31 | CROWDER Andrew E. | V D D V D D | V V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 32 | DIAZ Julio P. | D D V D D V | V V D | 4.6 | 2 | -2.6 |
| 33 | WOOD Alexander W. | V V V V V V | D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 34 | BALBOA Rolando M. | V V V V V D | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 35 | KAIHATSU Edward J. | V D V V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 36 | BROWN Jason | V V D D V V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 37 | LESNIAK Chuck | D D V V V V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 38 | VALENTINE Iain | D D V V V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 39 | DENMAN Matthew L. | V D D D V V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 40 | FRENZINGER Douglas | D V V D V D | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 41 | RODRIGUEZ VINCENT | D D V V V D | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 42 | MINOTT Nicolas D. | V D V D D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 43 | VOYIAZIAKIS Emanuel | D V D V D V | D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 44 | GLADNICK Michael J. | V D D D V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 45 | WILBERT Matt | D V D D V V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 46 | STOY Patrick | V D D V D V | D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
| 47 | JEFFCOAT Timothy | V V D V D D | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 48 | DRAKE David L. | D V D V V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 49 | DE BARROS CONTI Thibaut | D D D V V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 50 | PATTERSON Jan (Janmon) M. | V D V V D D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 51 | RUSANOV Oleg | V V V D D D | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 52 | CLIPPARD Erik J. | D V V D D D | V D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 53 | JOHANSON David B. | V D D D D V | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 54 | BENNETT Philippe | D D D V D V | V | 4.6 | 2 | -2.6 |
| 55 | REARDON Patrick M. | D D D V D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 56 | BHATT Jay | V V D D D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 57 | TOMASI John | D V D V D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 58 | TOWSTER Robert | D D V V D D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 59 | GARDNER William | D V D D V D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 60 | SVIHL Dale | V D V D D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 61 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | D D V D D V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 62 | LEYLAND John | D D D D V D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 63 | WHARTON David | V D D D D D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 64 | CARRINO David | D D D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 65 | HERNANDEZ Marc A. | D V V D D V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 66 | PIATKOWSKI-NAZARRO RPT Marek W. | V D V D D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 67 | MONSEFI Amir | D D D V V D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 68 | GUERRERO Gonzalo | D V V D D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 69 | BERBERI Matt | D V D D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 70 | MUELLER Donn | D D D D D V | D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 71 | BERGER Jamie | D V D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 72 | NEWELL Tim | V D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 73 | LEE Hans | D V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 74 | ZAIDI Sohail | V D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 75 | PRECCIOZZI Aldo F. | D D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 76 | HOLCOMB Michael | D D D D D V | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 77 | HILL David E. | D D D D D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 78 | WOOD BEn | D D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
| 79 | BERKE Daniel (Dan) L. | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 80 | PRYOR Ted | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 81 | BOTWINICK Nelson G. | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 81 | DOVER Felix | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 83 | WEMPLE Charles | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 84 | GIRALDO Elias | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.