Duke Energy Convention Center - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | HURME Tommi K. | V V D V | V V V V V | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 2 | HALLMAN Nicholas (Nick) J. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 3 | MACZIK Adam W. | V D V D V | V V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 3 | LIOU Solomon | D V D V V | V V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 5 | CONKLIN Jim | V V V V | V V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 6 | SPROWLES Cameron D. | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 7 | MANDOKI Sandor I. | V V V D V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 8 | MAKMATOV Vadim | D D V D D | V V D | 3.7 | 1 | -2.7 |
| 9 | TSINIS Alexander E. | V V V V V V | V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 10 | CHRISTY Peter C. | V V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 11 | YAMASAKI Kyle A. | D V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 12 | OLIVERIUS Joseph W. | V V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 13 | COX Matthew T. | V D V V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 14 | DEPAUW Devan | D V D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 15 | CHU Brandon A. | V D D V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 16 | FIEDERLEIN Andrew M. | V V D V D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 17 | CARTER Austin L. | V V V V V | D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 18 | FENOUL Frederic | V V V V D | D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 19 | SUVOROV Yuly | D D V V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 20 | LEWIS-RAMIREZ Ben | V V D D V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 21 | MCGRATH Sean L. | D V V D V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 22 | GOLCU Doruk | V D D V V | D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
| 23 | STOCK Jordan | D D V D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 24 | ELBAG Mark H. | V D D D V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 25 | POTTER Joshua (Josh) M. | D V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 26 | MCNALLY Thomas J. | V D D V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 27 | LAWLOR Lee | V D D V D | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 28 | KIM Jeff | D D V V D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 29 | VALENTINE Shem | V V D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 30 | MORET Eric N. | D V D D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 31 | KRIEGER Nathanial | D D D V D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 32 | SUCHOSKI Annika | D D D D D | V D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 33 | ISAAC Mena | D V V D D | D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 34 | EVERT Todd | D V D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 35 | PEI Suyang | D V D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 37 | LOCASALE Nicholas A. | D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 38 | REED David | D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 39 | FULLER II Thomas | D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 40 | TURNER Joshua | D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 41 | CHI Kai-Hung | D D D D V D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 42 | COLE Matthew | D D D D D V | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 43 | MIZRAHI Meir | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.