February NAC

Veteran Men's Épée

Sunday, February 15, 2026 at 8:00 AM

Duke Energy Convention Center - Cincinnati, OH, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LICHTEN Keith H. - - - - 4% 28% 68%
2 MACZIK Adam W. - - 2% 14% 42% 41%
3 KROGH Daniel (Dan) M. 1% 8% 27% 38% 22% 4%
3 YAMASAKI Kyle A. - - 1% 7% 24% 41% 27%
5 DEUCHER Joseph H. - - - 4% 19% 42% 35%
6 HALLMAN Nicholas (Nick) J. - - 1% 8% 28% 41% 22%
7 GERSEN Jacob 2% 13% 29% 33% 18% 5% -
8 ZUCKER Noah L. - - 2% 14% 41% 43%
9 PRIHODKO Andrew - 2% 12% 32% 38% 16%
10 CARTER Austin L. - 2% 11% 28% 34% 20% 5%
11 CHRISTY Peter C. - - 3% 15% 34% 34% 13%
12 SUVOROV Yuly - - 2% 14% 36% 37% 10%
13 CHENG Thomas - - 3% 16% 36% 34% 11%
14 MAKMATOV Vadim - - 1% 7% 24% 41% 27%
15 HITCHCOCK David - - 1% 10% 29% 40% 20%
16 TEITENBERG John F. - 1% 4% 16% 34% 34% 12%
17 CONKLIN Jim - - 2% 12% 35% 42% 8%
18 GLASS Timothy C. - - 5% 21% 37% 28% 7%
19 LIOU Solomon - - 3% 18% 45% 30% 4%
20 GATES Darcy C. - - - 2% 14% 41% 42%
21 KIM Jeff - 7% 25% 36% 24% 7% 1%
22 GREENBAUM Isaac - - 2% 14% 35% 37% 12%
23 WHEELER Daniel - - 1% 11% 32% 39% 17%
24 BARREIRO Darren - - 1% 9% 27% 40% 22%
25 LEE Tobias (Toby) T. - 1% 5% 19% 34% 30% 11%
26 HELGE James R. - 4% 19% 34% 30% 12% 2%
27 EVERT Todd - 3% 15% 33% 32% 14% 2%
28 PHO Eric - 1% 9% 31% 43% 16%
29 HABIB Farooq - - - 4% 20% 43% 33%
30 BLAT Robert 2% 11% 27% 33% 20% 6% 1%
31 KENT Dwain - 4% 18% 36% 32% 10%
32 CHU Brandon A. 5% 24% 38% 25% 7% 1%
33 CLAWSON Brian C. - - 2% 12% 32% 37% 16%
34 HARRIS Robert S. - - 2% 14% 35% 35% 13%
35 MEHALL Michael - - - - 4% 29% 67%
36 CRANOR Erich L. - - 4% 20% 43% 32%
37 COX Matthew T. - - 3% 15% 35% 35% 12%
38 GERACI Paul A. - - 5% 21% 37% 29% 8%
39 HUDSON Jeffrey (Jeff) A. - - 1% 7% 25% 41% 26%
40 YAO Shun - 2% 10% 26% 35% 22% 5%
41 PEI Suyang 1% 12% 34% 35% 15% 3% -
42 VARNEY John R. - 3% 17% 37% 33% 9%
43 TYSON Julian F. - - 1% 13% 41% 39% 6%
44 RODACHY Jeffrey M. - 3% 15% 35% 33% 12% 1%
45 DEPAUW Devan - 2% 11% 29% 35% 20% 4%
47 LAWLOR Lee - 6% 28% 43% 20% 3% -
48 PERKA Michael - 5% 22% 38% 28% 6%
49 SPRINGER Michael - 1% 6% 22% 37% 28% 6%
50 GOLCU Doruk 4% 23% 39% 25% 7% 1% -
51 O'DOWD Andrew J. - 3% 16% 31% 31% 15% 3%
52 YAKIMENKO Andrei - 1% 11% 30% 37% 18% 3%
53 JOYCE David - 7% 24% 34% 25% 9% 1%
54 BRANG David J. - 3% 14% 31% 33% 16% 3%
55 WILKINSON Derek H. - - 4% 19% 37% 31% 9%
56 CHEN Steve - 1% 11% 33% 36% 16% 3%
57 CAMPBELL Paul 6% 26% 38% 23% 6% 1% -
58 SIMMONS Matthew C. - 4% 19% 35% 30% 11% 2%
59 BECK Brian C. 7% 31% 40% 18% 4% - -
60 POTTER Joshua (Josh) M. - 1% 8% 25% 36% 24% 5%
61 MCGRATH Sean L. - 6% 22% 34% 26% 10% 2%
62 ELTERMAN Lev 1% 9% 27% 35% 21% 6% 1%
63 MARINI Davide 24% 42% 26% 7% 1% -
64 STEWART Robert - 5% 21% 37% 29% 8%
65 KURITZ Marc M. 5% 20% 34% 27% 11% 2% -
65 GREGORY Dean 4% 18% 34% 29% 13% 3% -
67 ELBAG Mark H. - - 3% 15% 34% 35% 13%
68 GROSSE Michael 1% 9% 26% 34% 22% 7% 1%
69 LOCASALE Nicholas A. 1% 6% 22% 37% 27% 7% -
70 FIEDERLEIN Andrew M. - 5% 20% 35% 29% 10% 1%
71 CARTER Tony - 5% 23% 37% 26% 8% 1%
72 MORET Eric N. 12% 36% 34% 15% 3% -
73 MCDONNELL Michael 6% 25% 38% 25% 6% -
74 MENDOZA Zandro 3% 18% 36% 31% 12% 2%
75 TURNER Joshua 8% 31% 38% 19% 4% -
76 SWANSON Dave 4% 19% 34% 29% 12% 2% -
77 MAYCHROWITZ Matt - 5% 21% 39% 29% 7%
78 SANTOS Felipe 1% 18% 38% 31% 11% 2% -
79 MARIANI Lou - 6% 22% 34% 26% 10% 2%
80 LIPTON Michael D. 7% 27% 36% 22% 7% 1% -
81 HUGHES Michael D. - 5% 22% 37% 27% 8% 1%
82 WALTING Paul J. 1% 10% 29% 36% 19% 4% -
83 EVANS Allen L. 12% 35% 35% 15% 3% -
84 TRAN John 1% 12% 32% 34% 17% 4% -
85 KRAMER Mark 1% 17% 38% 31% 11% 2% -
86 FREY Wayne N. 1% 14% 35% 34% 14% 3% -
87 KRIEGER Nathanial 1% 6% 22% 34% 26% 9% 1%
88 MCNALLY Thomas J. 2% 14% 32% 32% 16% 4% -
89 KERTESZ Stefan G. 1% 21% 40% 28% 9% 1% -
90 WHITELOCK James R. 5% 30% 38% 21% 5% 1% -
91 REED David 4% 27% 44% 21% 3% - -
92 SUCHOSKI Annika 19% 41% 30% 9% 1% - -
93 KLINE R. Jay 9% 32% 37% 17% 3% -
93 MALLOY Christopher B. 12% 38% 36% 13% 2% - -
95 CHI Kai-Hung 45% 40% 13% 2% - - -
96 WAGMAN Robert S. 7% 27% 38% 22% 5% -
97 DOWNEY Gerard C. 23% 42% 27% 7% 1% -
97 NUDELMAN Aleksandr 6% 25% 38% 24% 6% -
99 EDWARDS Tim 1% 13% 34% 35% 15% 3% -
100 KOKENGE Chad 7% 31% 37% 19% 5% 1% -
101 DAVIS Kelly 51% 38% 10% 1% - - -
102 MINOTT Nicolas D. 30% 42% 22% 6% 1% - -
103 SIMS Martin L. 28% 45% 22% 4% - - -
104 COLE Matthew 2% 13% 32% 33% 16% 4% -
104 VALENTINE Shem 27% 41% 24% 7% 1% - -
106 KRUGER Mark 6% 22% 34% 26% 10% 2% -
107 GAO "George" Xiaojiang 14% 42% 32% 10% 1% - -
108 RODRIGUEZ VINCENT 31% 42% 21% 5% 1% - -
109 MIZRAHI Meir 40% 43% 15% 2% - - -
110 VERWORN Jonathan 66% 30% 4% - - - -
111 JEFFCOAT Timothy 44% 42% 13% 2% - - -
112 RESS Michael A. - 2% 13% 34% 35% 14% 2%
113 BAGAMANOV Ruslan 7% 33% 37% 18% 4% 1% -
114 BEITTEL David F. 9% 28% 34% 21% 7% 1% -
115 HUNKER Frederick 27% 42% 24% 6% 1% -
116 ROGERS John D. 81% 18% 1% - - - -
116 TOMASI John 29% 43% 23% 5% - -
118 ANDERSON Donald 58% 34% 7% 1% - - -
119 KALAPASEV Nenad (Ned) (Ned) S. < 1% 1% 8% 24% 36% 25% 6%
120 LONADIER Robert 87% 12% 1% - - - -
121 TREANOR Donald K. 4% 22% 38% 27% 8% 1% -
122 DELONG Mike 6% 37% 41% 14% 2% - -
123 ROZALSKI Pavel 90% 9% - - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.