February NAC

Veteran Men's Épée

Sunday, February 15, 2026 at 8:00 AM

Duke Energy Convention Center - Cincinnati, OH, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 LICHTEN Keith H. V V V V D D V V V V V V V 5.6 4 -1.6
2 MACZIK Adam W. V V V V V V V V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
3 KROGH Daniel (Dan) M. D V D V D V V V V V D 2.8 2 -0.8
3 YAMASAKI Kyle A. V V V V V V V V V V D 4.9 6 +1.1
5 DEUCHER Joseph H. V V V V D V V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
6 HALLMAN Nicholas (Nick) J. D V V V V V V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
7 GERSEN Jacob V V V D V V V V V V D 2.7 5 +2.3
8 ZUCKER Noah L. V V V V D V V V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
9 PRIHODKO Andrew V V V V V V V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
10 CARTER Austin L. D V V V V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
11 CHRISTY Peter C. D V V V V V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
12 SUVOROV Yuly V V V V D D V V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
13 CHENG Thomas D V V V V D V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
14 MAKMATOV Vadim V D V D V V V V V D 4.9 4 -0.9
15 HITCHCOCK David V D D V D V V V V D 4.7 3 -1.7
16 TEITENBERG John F. D D V D V D V V V D 4.3 2 -2.3
17 CONKLIN Jim V V V V V V V D 4.4 6 +1.6
18 GLASS Timothy C. V V V V V V V D 4.1 6 +1.9
19 LIOU Solomon V V V V V V V D 4.1 6 +1.9
20 GATES Darcy C. V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
21 KIM Jeff V V V V V V V V D 3.0 6 +3.0
22 GREENBAUM Isaac V V V V D V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
23 WHEELER Daniel V V V V D V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
24 BARREIRO Darren V V V V D V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
25 LEE Tobias (Toby) T. V V V V V D V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
26 HELGE James R. V V D V V V V V D 3.3 5 +1.7
27 EVERT Todd V D V V V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
28 PHO Eric V V V V D V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
29 HABIB Farooq D V V V V D V V D 5.0 4 -1.0
30 BLAT Robert V V D V V D V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
31 KENT Dwain V D V D V V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
32 CHU Brandon A. V V D D V V V D 2.0 3 +1.0
33 CLAWSON Brian C. V V V V V V V D 4.5 6 +1.5
34 HARRIS Robert S. V D V V V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
35 MEHALL Michael V V D V V V V D 5.6 5 -0.6
36 CRANOR Erich L. V V V D V V D 4.0 4 -
37 COX Matthew T. V V D V V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
38 GERACI Paul A. V V V V V D V D 4.1 5 +0.9
39 HUDSON Jeffrey (Jeff) A. V V V V D V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
40 YAO Shun V V V D V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
41 PEI Suyang V V D D V V V D 2.6 4 +1.4
42 VARNEY John R. V D V V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
43 TYSON Julian F. V D D V V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
44 RODACHY Jeffrey M. V V D D V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
45 DEPAUW Devan V D D V V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
47 LAWLOR Lee D V V D V V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
48 PERKA Michael V D V D V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
49 SPRINGER Michael D D V D V V V D 4.0 3 -1.0
50 GOLCU Doruk D D V D V V V D 2.1 3 +0.9
51 O'DOWD Andrew J. V V D D D V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
52 YAKIMENKO Andrei D D V V D V V D 3.7 3 -0.7
53 JOYCE David V D D V V D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
54 BRANG David J. V D V V D D V D 3.5 3 -0.5
55 WILKINSON Derek H. V V D D D V V D 4.2 3 -1.2
56 CHEN Steve D D V D V V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
57 CAMPBELL Paul D D D D V V V D 2.0 2 -
58 SIMMONS Matthew C. D V D V D D V D 3.3 2 -1.3
59 BECK Brian C. D V V D D D V D 1.8 2 +0.2
60 POTTER Joshua (Josh) M. D D V D V D V D 3.9 2 -1.9
61 MCGRATH Sean L. D V D D D V V D 3.2 2 -1.2
62 ELTERMAN Lev V D V D D D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
63 MARINI Davide D D D D V V D 1.2 1 -0.2
64 STEWART Robert D V D D D V D 3.1 1 -2.1
65 KURITZ Marc M. D V V V D V D 2.3 4 +1.7
65 GREGORY Dean D V D V V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
67 ELBAG Mark H. D V V D V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
68 GROSSE Michael D D V V V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
69 LOCASALE Nicholas A. V V V V D D D 3.0 4 +1.0
70 FIEDERLEIN Andrew M. V V D V D V D 3.2 4 +0.8
71 CARTER Tony V V D D V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
72 MORET Eric N. D V V V D D 1.6 3 +1.4
73 MCDONNELL Michael D V D V V D 2.0 3 +1.0
74 MENDOZA Zandro V D D V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
75 TURNER Joshua D V D V D D 1.8 2 +0.2
76 SWANSON Dave V D D V D V D 2.3 3 +0.7
77 MAYCHROWITZ Matt V D V D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
78 SANTOS Felipe V V D V D D D 2.4 3 +0.6
79 MARIANI Lou D D V V D V D 3.2 3 -0.2
80 LIPTON Michael D. D V D V V D D 2.0 3 +1.0
81 HUGHES Michael D. V D D V V D D 3.1 3 -0.1
82 WALTING Paul J. D D V V V D D 2.7 3 +0.3
83 EVANS Allen L. D D V V D D 1.6 2 +0.4
84 TRAN John V D D D D V D 2.7 2 -0.7
85 KRAMER Mark V D D D V D D 2.4 2 -0.4
86 FREY Wayne N. D D D D V V D 2.6 2 -0.6
87 KRIEGER Nathanial V V D D D D D 3.1 2 -1.1
88 MCNALLY Thomas J. D V V D D D 2.6 2 -0.6
89 KERTESZ Stefan G. D D V V D D D 2.3 2 -0.3
90 WHITELOCK James R. V D V D D D D 1.9 2 +0.1
91 REED David D D D V D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
92 SUCHOSKI Annika D V D D V D D 1.3 2 +0.7
93 KLINE R. Jay D V D D V D 1.7 2 +0.3
93 MALLOY Christopher B. V D D V D D D 1.6 2 +0.4
95 CHI Kai-Hung D V D D V D D 0.7 2 +1.3
96 WAGMAN Robert S. D D V D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
97 DOWNEY Gerard C. D D D D V D 1.2 1 -0.2
97 NUDELMAN Aleksandr V D D D D D 2.0 1 -1.0
99 EDWARDS Tim D D V D D D D 2.6 1 -1.6
100 KOKENGE Chad D D V D D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
101 DAVIS Kelly D V D D D D D 0.6 1 +0.4
102 MINOTT Nicolas D. D D D D V D D 1.1 1 -0.1
103 SIMS Martin L. D D D V D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
104 COLE Matthew D V D D D D D 2.6 1 -1.6
104 VALENTINE Shem D D D V D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
106 KRUGER Mark D D D D V D D 2.2 1 -1.2
107 GAO "George" Xiaojiang D V D D D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
108 RODRIGUEZ VINCENT V D D D D D D 1.0 1 -
109 MIZRAHI Meir D D D D V D D 0.8 1 +0.2
110 VERWORN Jonathan D V D D D D D 0.4 1 +0.6
111 JEFFCOAT Timothy D D D D D V D 0.7 1 +0.3
112 RESS Michael A. D D V D D D D 3.5 1 -2.5
113 BAGAMANOV Ruslan D D D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8
114 BEITTEL David F. D D D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9
115 HUNKER Frederick D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
116 ROGERS John D. D D D D D D D 0.2 0 -0.2
116 TOMASI John D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
118 ANDERSON Donald D D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
119 KALAPASEV Nenad (Ned) (Ned) S. D D D D D D D 3.9 0 -3.9
120 LONADIER Robert D D D D D D D 0.1 0 -0.1
121 TREANOR Donald K. D D D D D D D 2.1 0 -2.1
122 DELONG Mike D D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7
123 ROZALSKI Pavel D D D D D D D 0.1 0 -0.1

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.