Savage Fencing Club - Savage, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YI Kyle | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 42% | 40% |
| 2 | TIRRELL Justin J. | - | - | 3% | 21% | 48% | 24% | 3% |
| 3 | MOAKLER Christopher | 11% | 39% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 3 | LEE Anton | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% | |
| 5 | ZANKOWSKI Brendan | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | |
| 6 | ADAMS Zachary J. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% | |
| 7 | SWENSON Keane J. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% | |
| 8 | YI Nathan | - | 3% | 23% | 51% | 20% | 2% | |
| 9 | CHEN Brian | - | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 41% | 13% |
| 10 | ANAFI Ari | - | 2% | 21% | 46% | 27% | 4% | |
| 11 | CHANEY Charles | - | 3% | 26% | 44% | 23% | 4% | |
| 12 | LEE Aiden | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 21% | |
| 13 | CARTER Austin L. | - | - | - | 7% | 43% | 49% | |
| 14 | KENYON Jacob | - | - | - | 6% | 36% | 58% | |
| 15 | EVANS Grant | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
| 16 | CANDELARIA Armando | - | 6% | 34% | 41% | 17% | 2% | |
| 17 | HALE Bradley | - | 2% | 57% | 36% | 4% | < 1% | |
| 18 | SNYDER IV William B. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 43% | 44% | |
| 19 | KENYON Benjamin | - | - | 1% | 15% | 54% | 30% | |
| 20 | BUCCELLATO Joel S. | 1% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | |
| 21 | GAMBINO Robert A. | - | - | 8% | 31% | 44% | 17% | |
| 22 | HUTZ Michael B. | - | 10% | 46% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 23 | JOHNSON Erik | - | 5% | 24% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 24 | ASUNCION Arren | - | 14% | 50% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
| 25 | KENDLER Micah | 8% | 63% | 26% | 3% | - | - | |
| 26 | ANDERSON Evan | 17% | 51% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | MOORE Guy L. | - | - | 24% | 55% | 19% | 2% | |
| 28 | MAGUIRE Timothy | 37% | 47% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 29 | BERGMANN Beatrix | 26% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | MEGGERS Samuel | - | 3% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 7% | |
| 31 | BEREKNYEI Thomas | - | < 1% | 6% | 30% | 45% | 18% | |
| 32 | REZAC Kevin J. | < 1% | 2% | 13% | 36% | 39% | 11% | |
| 33 | TRAN Alex | 3% | 64% | 29% | 4% | - | - | |
| 34 | BEREKNYEI Lukas | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 35 | WOOLF Fredrika | 9% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 36 | NESTERUK Hope | 15% | 83% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | ECKENROAD Hannah | 2% | 40% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | MURPHY Megan | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | |
| 38 | TRAUTH Laura | 4% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 40 | SAMPAIO Beatriz | 84% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 41 | PAWTAN Carly | 83% | 16% | - | - | - | - | |
| 42 | FONS Jennifer | 91% | 8% | - | - | - | - | |
| 43 | FONS Amandine | 82% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.