Mission Fencing Center - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WU Wallace | - | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 74% |
| 2 | HUANG Dalynn | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% | |
| 3 | CAO Aaron | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
| 3 | SU Sean | - | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
| 5 | ZHANG Eric | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
| 6 | CASCONE Raffaele | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 6% | |
| 7 | WANG Leon | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 1% |
| 8 | TARDIFF Owen | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 1% |
| 9 | YOON Mason | - | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
| 10 | FANG Lionel | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 11 | DEL VALLE-LIN Julian | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 12 | LIU Yuyang | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 13 | KANAN Noland | - | 6% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 5% | |
| 14 | YU Oliver | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
| 15 | HO Marcus | - | 7% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 16 | GENG Vincent | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | CAI Charlie | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 18 | LIN Tyler | 21% | 47% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 19 | LU Jason | 47% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 20 | SANTHOSH Riaan | - | 3% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 21 | CHEN Jonathan | 7% | 49% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 22 | CHIN Gregory | 3% | 17% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 23 | CHIN Iker | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 24 | JIANG Alexander | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 25 | DEMARTINIS Michael | < 1% | 1% | 21% | 43% | 29% | 6% | |
| 26 | YOON Noah | 46% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 27 | FUNG Parker | 82% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.