Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center: Atlanta, GA - Atlanta, GA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TIYA BIAYA K. | - | - | - | 1% | 15% | 45% | 39% |
| 2 | WONG Garrick G. | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 29% |
| 3 | FEDELI Caterina S. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 41% | 49% |
| 3 | KORABLIN Anton | - | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 78% |
| 5 | ANDREYENKA Yana | - | - | - | - | 10% | 49% | 41% |
| 6 | KORABLINA Aleksandra | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% |
| 7 | ANDREYENKA Hanna | - | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 46% | 16% |
| 8 | ANDREEVA Alla | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 48% | 13% | 1% |
| 9 | GUO Sean | - | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 47% | 15% |
| 10 | ZAIDI Adil | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 31% | 2% |
| 11 | HARKINS Craig T. | - | - | - | 6% | 37% | 45% | 11% |
| 12 | YOON Junhyeok | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 51% | 38% |
| 13 | MOORE Jeremy S. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 19% | 80% |
| 14 | WILLIAMS Kenneth H. | - | - | 2% | 18% | 50% | 28% | 2% |
| 15 | MO Jason | - | - | - | 3% | 20% | 53% | 23% |
| 16 | WEBB Jacob T. | - | - | - | 7% | 39% | 49% | 5% |
| 17 | PARK Lina | - | - | - | - | 2% | 24% | 73% |
| 18 | SHEHORN Connor | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 57% | 10% |
| 19 | IQBAL Mariam | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 20 | NIKOLIC Alexandra | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% |
| 21 | KUTATELADZE Anna | 33% | 42% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 21 | HARKINS Asher | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 46% | 15% | 1% |
| 23 | URBANSKI Logan | - | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 39% | 12% |
| 24 | YOU Chanmin | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 25 | MAXWELL CJ F. | - | 2% | 18% | 42% | 33% | 5% | - |
| 26 | PARK Zena | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 37% | 11% |
| 27 | MCARTHUR Kemp | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 28 | ROSSEN Michael | - | 6% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 29 | DING Tommy | - | 1% | 21% | 49% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 30 | MONAGHAN Claire (Micah) | 1% | 26% | 45% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 31 | GALLUCCI Julianna | - | 4% | 26% | 50% | 17% | 1% | - |
| 32 | CAO Kellen | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 33 | GILLIAM Elijah | 4% | 27% | 49% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | MAXWELL Austin | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 35 | SANDS Cooper | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | BABER Eshaal | 8% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | ALLEN Charles | 3% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 38 | LOBEL Dillan | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 39 | LEBEDOVYCH Tristin | - | - | 5% | 27% | 51% | 15% | 1% |
| 40 | LITTLE Andrew R. | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 41 | BEDWORTH Paige | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% |
| 42 | MOSS Riley | 19% | 44% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 43 | MCCONNELL Aidan | 18% | 50% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 44 | ZHOU Hannan | 33% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 45 | CARNEY Landon | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | WONG Grace | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 47 | BRISON Alexander | 15% | 43% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | SEGURA Matthew | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 49 | WHITE Kevin | 20% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | CARDINAL Elise | 32% | 46% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 51 | AYANA Guteraa | 19% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | BLACK Elias | 12% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | EKMEKCILER Onur | 2% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 10% | - | - |
| 54 | MEIGHAN Joshua | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 55 | O'DONNELL Molly | 4% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 56 | ANDUJAR Gerardo | 53% | 40% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 57 | WOODCOCK Dylan Ajani | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 58 | BARLOW Christopher | 5% | 37% | 40% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 59 | WALKER Kendall | 1% | 12% | 36% | 37% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 60 | GIRA Collin | 27% | 49% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 61 | CLAROS Gianna | 3% | 26% | 49% | 20% | 2% | - | - |
| 61 | MOR Palak | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 63 | PATTERSON Emma | 16% | 46% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.