Ataba Fencing Club February Challenge

Div II Mixed Épée

Saturday, February 28, 2026 at 10:00 AM

Ataba Fencing Club - Hartland, WI, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Birth Year

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

#	Name	Number of victories
#	Name	0	1	2	3	4	5	6
1	BROCK Joshua	-	-	1%	9%	29%	40%	21%
2	GRANSTROM Colin	-	-	4%	20%	42%	28%	4%
3	NASSOS Eric	-	2%	11%	29%	36%	19%	3%
3	MURALIDARAN Rishab	-	1%	13%	35%	35%	14%	2%
5	SWANSON Dave	-	-	4%	22%	44%	25%	4%
6	SNYDER Alex	-	-	-	4%	23%	51%	23%
7	WEAVER Edward	-	-	4%	17%	33%	33%	13%
8	DELA CRUZ Noel	-	1%	6%	20%	36%	30%	9%
9	LOHR-KOUGL Eadrick	-	1%	9%	26%	36%	23%	5%
10	BURKHARDT Krista L.	-	3%	16%	34%	32%	14%	2%
11	ST. GEORGE David J.	-	-	7%	25%	38%	25%	5%
12	STEINEKE Warren	-	1%	9%	29%	38%	20%	3%
13	KATZMAN Anara	2%	18%	38%	30%	10%	1%	-
14	HENSEL Kaeleb	3%	17%	36%	31%	12%	2%	-
15	HONERMEIER Max	-	8%	33%	38%	18%	3%	-
16	BERTRAND Reece	-	6%	23%	35%	25%	8%	1%
17	AMICH Steve J.	2%	15%	32%	32%	15%	3%	-
18	PRONIEWSKI Julian	32%	43%	20%	4%	-	-	-
19	JOYCE Brady	2%	18%	36%	30%	12%	2%	-
20	FOATE Bryton	-	1%	5%	19%	35%	31%	9%
21	KELTY Chase	-	1%	5%	18%	33%	31%	12%
22	NIXON Bailey	26%	40%	25%	8%	1%	-	-
23	ENGE Sutton	-	-	3%	16%	37%	34%	10%
24	ALLER Bruce	44%	42%	12%	1%	-	-	-
24	COLUCCI Isabella	19%	39%	30%	10%	2%	-	-
26	BOEMBEKE Maxwell	7%	27%	39%	22%	5%	-	-
27	SATHIYAMOORTHY Vikranth	4%	17%	32%	29%	14%	3%	-
28	DORNFELD Elizabeth	-	1%	7%	24%	39%	25%	4%
29	RUTH Erin	1%	6%	21%	35%	27%	9%	1%
30	ZHANG Eric	3%	17%	37%	32%	10%	1%	-
31	KOWALSKI Jesse	1%	7%	24%	35%	25%	8%	1%
32	PROCTO Steven	1%	13%	35%	33%	14%	3%	-
33	PATE Luke	1%	8%	26%	35%	22%	6%	1%
34	BOEMBEKE Amelia	36%	44%	17%	3%	-	-	-
35	SKILLINGS Byron	24%	52%	21%	3%	-	-	-

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

Each cell in a fencer's row corresponds to a specific number of victories, starting from the left with no victories and increasing to the right, indicating victories in all bouts.
The shading of each cell represents the probability of that particular victory outcome for the fencer. Darker shades indicate higher probabilities, suggesting that the outcome is more likely based on past performances. On the other hand, lighter shades point towards less probable outcomes.
The boxed number in a cell represents the actual number of victories the fencer achieved in the pool, making it easy to compare predicted probabilities with actual outcomes at a glance.
By examining the gradient from lighter to darker cells, you can get an intuitive sense of where a fencer's victories are more or less expected based on their historical performance.

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.

Want to keep up with all things fencingtracker? Join our Discord community here.