Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 44% | 42% |
2 | SU Caleb | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 56% |
3 | LEE Samuel Y. | - | 3% | 21% | 42% | 29% | 6% |
3 | KIM Brandon | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 7% |
5 | ZHENG Andy | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 6% |
6 | CLICK Tristan | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
7 | CHEN Brian | 1% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% | |
8 | LEE Aiden | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
9 | TANG August L. | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 40% | 14% |
10 | WOLFE Alex | 2% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
11 | ZHANG Kingston | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | |
12 | LEE John | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
13 | SAUNIER Cameron | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
14 | ZHENG Jerry | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
15 | JENKINS Declan | 3% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 6% | - |
16 | TANG Alexander L. | 3% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 6% | - |
17 | KIM Jaden | 6% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 4% | - |
18 | YU Jason | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
19 | FARBER Ian S. | 28% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
20 | LU Nathan | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
21 | WINTERHOF William | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
22 | ALI Farhan | 44% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
23 | SIEDOW William | 8% | 33% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.