Happy Stages - North Hollywood, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HOROWITZ Shuli | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 39% |
| 2 | WU Chingfei Amber | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 3 | LI Alice | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 39% | 53% |
| 3 | LIU Ashley | - | - | 2% | 22% | 47% | 28% | |
| 5 | CHOI Jion | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 40% |
| 6 | HSIAO Ariya | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 7 | ZHOU Joi | - | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 41% | 28% |
| 8 | RUI Jessie | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 45% | 18% |
| 9 | MIYASHIRO Katelyn | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 64% |
| 10 | SAIFEE Zahra | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | < 1% |
| 11 | KIM Natalie | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 5% |
| 12 | FANG Kelervia | - | - | 1% | 5% | 25% | 50% | 19% |
| 13 | KENSICKI Phoebe | - | - | 5% | 32% | 45% | 17% | |
| 14 | PARK Lauren | - | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% |
| 15 | DENG Claire | - | - | 5% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 5% |
| 16 | YANG Hanli | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 17 | ZEE Savannah | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 18 | WANG Doreen | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 19 | SAIFEE Sakina | 4% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 20 | CHEN Madeleine | 2% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 21 | TU Averie | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 22 | LEE Abigail | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
| 23 | LI Chelsea | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 24 | CHUNG Katie | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 25 | HAN Gian | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 26 | CHOI Sophie | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 27 | YUEN Kaitlyn | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 28 | DEJOY Leilah | 36% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 29 | ZHANG Queeny | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 30 | SHEN Gloria | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 31 | LIM Kensie | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 32 | BASTUNAS Marissa | 15% | 53% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 33 | SANTIAGO Rania | 27% | 52% | 20% | 2% | < 1% | - | |
| 34 | LI Sophia | 7% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 35 | ZHANG Hannah | - | 2% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 36 | TEWARI Amaira | - | 2% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
| 37 | HAYLETT Emily | - | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 38 | LAVERY Lucy | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 39 | PAWAR Sanvi | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | WANG Ellen | 5% | 30% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 41 | IRELAND Moira | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | YANG Byanca | 44% | 45% | 10% | - | - | - | |
| 43 | YU Sophie | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 44 | GOWDA Siyona | - | 6% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 45 | DESAI Zoya | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 46 | KIM Ines | 13% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 47 | VOROBIEV Alexandra | 4% | 29% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | OLSHANSKY Dalia | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 49 | JONES Olivia | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 50 | SOUSA Lauren | 64% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 51 | YAO Abby | < 1% | - | 4% | 30% | 46% | 19% | |
| 52 | BHANGOO Paloma | 13% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | RENGANATHAN Krithiga | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 53 | HANEY-DANIEL Quinlyn | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 55 | OH Amber | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.