Happy Stages - North Hollywood, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HOROWITZ Shuli | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 39% |
| 2 | WU Chingfei Amber | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
| 3 | LI Alice | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 53% |
| 3 | LIU Ashley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% | 28% | |
| 5 | CHOI Jion | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 40% |
| 6 | HSIAO Ariya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 24% |
| 7 | ZHOU Joi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 28% |
| 8 | RUI Jessie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 18% |
| 9 | MIYASHIRO Katelyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% |
| 10 | SAIFEE Zahra | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | < 1% |
| 11 | KIM Natalie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 5% |
| 12 | FANG Kelervia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 19% |
| 13 | KENSICKI Phoebe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 62% | 17% | |
| 14 | PARK Lauren | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
| 15 | DENG Claire | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 35% | 5% |
| 16 | YANG Hanli | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 17 | ZEE Savannah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 18 | WANG Doreen | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 19 | SAIFEE Sakina | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 20 | CHEN Madeleine | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 21 | TU Averie | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 22 | LEE Abigail | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
| 23 | LI Chelsea | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 24 | CHUNG Katie | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 25 | HAN Gian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 26 | CHOI Sophie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 22% | 3% |
| 27 | YUEN Kaitlyn | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 28 | DEJOY Leilah | 100% | 64% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 29 | ZHANG Queeny | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 30 | SHEN Gloria | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | LIM Kensie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
| 32 | BASTUNAS Marissa | 100% | 85% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 33 | SANTIAGO Rania | 100% | 73% | 22% | 2% | < 1% | - | |
| 34 | LI Sophia | 100% | 93% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 35 | ZHANG Hannah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 9% | 1% |
| 36 | TEWARI Amaira | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 37 | HAYLETT Emily | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 38 | LAVERY Lucy | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 39 | PAWAR Sanvi | 100% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | WANG Ellen | 100% | 95% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 41 | IRELAND Moira | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | YANG Byanca | 100% | 56% | 11% | - | - | - | |
| 43 | YU Sophie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 44 | GOWDA Siyona | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 45 | DESAI Zoya | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 46 | KIM Ines | 100% | 87% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 47 | VOROBIEV Alexandra | 100% | 96% | 67% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | OLSHANSKY Dalia | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 2% | - |
| 49 | JONES Olivia | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 50 | SOUSA Lauren | 100% | 36% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 51 | YAO Abby | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 65% | 19% | |
| 52 | BHANGOO Paloma | 100% | 87% | 48% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 53 | RENGANATHAN Krithiga | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 53 | HANEY-DANIEL Quinlyn | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 55 | OH Amber | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.