Happy Stages - North Hollywood, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BERTEL Florian | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 2 | DU Evan | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
| 3 | PARRA Lucas | - | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% |
| 3 | KIM Daniel | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 5 | LIANG Donny | - | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 39% | 24% |
| 5 | MOSLEY Wally | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 7 | ONG David | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 8 | LEE Lucas | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 6% |
| 9 | WOO Lucas | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 10 | MENG Haoyi | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 11 | XUE Michael | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% |
| 12 | WANG Lucas | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 13 | ENG Kyler | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 14 | NGUYEN Ethan V. | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 15 | LIN Bryan | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 16 | KIM Remington | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
| 17 | RONG Gordon | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 32% |
| 18 | DENG Destin | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 3% |
| 19 | LEUNG Dylan | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 20 | HAMILTON Travis | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 21 | MAXU Tiger | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 3% |
| 22 | TOUSSAINT Wizard | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 23 | SCHWARTZMAN Ethan | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 24 | RONG Marcus | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 25 | CHIEN Ian | 5% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 26 | SHOURIE Neel | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 27 | LIU Xuyao | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 28 | SUN Jerry | - | 12% | 31% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 29 | JU Shang | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 30 | FRANCK Nicholas | 5% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 31 | ZHANG Michael | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 32 | MAI Sy | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | WANG Dylan | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 34 | SHOURIE Seth | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 35 | LIU Yihong | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 36 | SHIH Derek | 13% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 37 | TRAN Thomas | 19% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | SHETTY Rohit | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 39 | ROLAND Nikolas | 41% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 40 | AUYEUNG Aedan Ho lam | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 41 | KOU Mason | 7% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 42 | HOBBS Fineas | 89% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.