Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
2 | WALTER Evran M. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% |
3 | SURINGA William J. | - | 10% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 2% |
3 | GISLER Benjamin B. | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
5 | LIU Eric Y. | 1% | 17% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
6 | TIAN Aaron C. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
7 | BEALE Asa G. | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
8 | PAULSON Connor M. | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 37% | |
9 | KEE Andrew L. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 37% | 56% |
10 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% |
11 | BUERGIN Aidan | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 38% | 10% |
12 | ALONSOZANA Luke | 1% | 18% | 43% | 31% | 7% | |
13 | O'CONNOR Kristian | 26% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
14 | SZEGO Bence P. | - | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 2% |
15 | FOTENOS Noah T. | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 13% | 1% |
16 | LEE Aidan | - | 4% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% |
17 | ALLAMPALLAM Maanav V. | - | 12% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 1% |
18 | SCHAEFER Joshua M. | 1% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
19 | ROSSEN Michael | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - |
20 | LONG Connor M. | - | 7% | 32% | 44% | 17% | |
21 | YU Jonathan J. | 6% | 42% | 39% | 12% | 1% | |
22 | LI Bojun | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
23 | WANG Waley | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
24 | GAO William | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 2% |
25 | DIXON Harrison L. | 2% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
26 | DRESSEL Jet | 23% | 46% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
27 | MURCH Leo | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
28 | BATRA Dev | 74% | 24% | 2% | - | - | |
29 | KANDAGADLA Rishi | 85% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.