Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
| 2 | GRAHAM Roy J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% |
| 3 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 44% |
| 3 | SYLVESTER William Z. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 60% | 17% | 1% |
| 5 | TIAN Aaron C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% |
| 6 | LEE Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 31% |
| 7 | ALLAMPALLAM Maanav V. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 34% | 4% |
| 8 | QIU Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 60% | 15% |
| 9 | YU Jonathan J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 31% | 4% |
| 10 | GOOR Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
| 11 | GISLER Benjamin B. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% | 4% |
| 12 | SURINGA William J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 26% | 1% |
| 13 | FOTENOS Noah T. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | 23% | 3% |
| 14 | BUERGIN Aidan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 12% |
| 15 | LONG Connor M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 18% |
| 16 | TRUBETSKI David | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 7% | - |
| 17 | O'CONNOR Kristian | 100% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 18 | LANNAMAN Connor | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | 14% | 1% |
| 19 | LIU Eric Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 30% | 3% |
| 20 | TSIMMERMAN Michael | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 10% |
| 21 | WANG Waley | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 10% | - |
| 22 | DRESSEL Jet | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 23 | SCHLOSSNAGLE Christopher | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 24 | LI Lianhao | 100% | 68% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 25 | SONG Austin | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | KADAVIL Joshua | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 27 | KANDAGADLA Rishi | 100% | 51% | 8% | - | - | - |
| 28 | SCHREIBER Samuel S. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
| 29 | BALAKIRSKIY Gabriel | 100% | 63% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | DE COQUET Maximilian | 100% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 31 | GAO William | 100% | 96% | 70% | 30% | 5% | - |
| 32 | BATRA Dev | 100% | 54% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | KOKE Matthew C. | 100% | 66% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | CHOO Christopher Y. | 100% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.