Mission Fencing Center - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GUTH Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 48% | 9% |
| 2 | LI Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% |
| 3 | DESANDO Michael R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% |
| 3 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 81% | |
| 5 | ZOBEL Eric H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | ||
| 6 | LI Arvin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 31% |
| 7 | LEE Brendan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
| 8 | SMITH Liam C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 50% |
| 9 | MAGIDSON Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% |
| 11 | MARTIN Darius | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
| 12 | DJONOUMA Toyohm | 100% | 99% | 84% | 40% | 4% | ||
| 13 | JOSEPH Willem | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 57% | 12% |
| 14 | WU DING-JUN | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 38% | 6% |
| 15 | LEE Charles T | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 30% | 4% |
| 16 | LIM Charlie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 35% | 5% |
| 17 | KO Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 26% | 3% |
| 18 | GORLOVITZKI Amitai | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 19 | ZHANG Julian | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 19% | 2% | - |
| 20 | SFINTESCU Alex | 100% | 99% | 86% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 21 | JIN Andy | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 22 | XU Nathan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 23 | COZINE Owen N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% | |
| 23 | BAI Brian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 52% | 7% | |
| 25 | BAI Austin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 7% |
| 26 | JIMENEZ Naveen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 42% | 4% | |
| 27 | CLARK Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 24% | 3% |
| 28 | HAN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 29 | WONG Jacob W. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 30 | CHO Xzander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 38% | 8% | 1% |
| 31 | CHAN Tyler | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% | |
| 32 | BERETICH Brian | 100% | 98% | 78% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | ZHAO Ryan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
| 34 | ZHAO Brian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 18% | 2% |
| 35 | HOU Gaven | 100% | 99% | 85% | 41% | 5% | ||
| 36 | KUO Phineas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 37 | XIE Jicheng | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% | 35% | 2% | |
| 38 | GRUNENWALD Henri | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 6% | 1% | |
| 39 | TOOMRE Kai | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | MONTALBINE Aidan | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 41 | TIKHAEV Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 18% | |
| 42 | SHANNON Jack | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 14% | 1% | |
| 44 | VIVEROS Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% | 5% |
| 45 | YANG David H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
| 46 | CHANG Xavier | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 47 | QUAN Noah | 100% | 87% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 48 | HOWARD Fox | 100% | 90% | 24% | 2% | - | - | |
| 49 | WAYBRIGHT Matteo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 12% | - |
| 50 | DEEB Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 23% |
| 51 | CHO Alexander | 100% | 94% | 62% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 52 | KINGSLEY Griffin | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 53 | TANG Jeremy | 100% | 85% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 54 | TAM Kyle | 100% | 99% | 83% | 34% | 5% | - | - |
| 55 | HUANG Jinyao | 100% | 85% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 56 | ZHENG Austin | 100% | 70% | 21% | 2% | - | ||
| 57 | PEREZ Logan | 100% | 98% | 77% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 58 | REYES Yannik | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 59 | HOLMES Alexiy | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 60 | QIAN Zekai | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 61 | DAO-CRESPO Joaquin | 100% | 94% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 62 | OH Joshua | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 63 | THOMAS Liam | 100% | 100% | 89% | 39% | 6% | - | |
| 64 | GALLER Dave | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 65 | VIVEROS Antonio | 100% | 90% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 66 | MCGREEVY Gavin | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 67 | BULIN Jack | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 69 | SMITH Colin | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 70 | CHANG Zane | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 71 | ZHANG Ethan | 100% | 63% | 16% | 1% | - | ||
| 71 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Alexander | 100% | 32% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 73 | COREAS Jonathan | 100% | 31% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 74 | TURCIOS Marvin | 100% | 43% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 75 | BEGUE DE RIESTHAL Max | 100% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.