March NAC

Div II Men's Épée

Sunday, March 8, 2026 at 8:00 AM

Huntington Convention Center of Cleveland - Cleveland, OH, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 SHOUSHA Yassin D V D V V V V V V V V V 3.9 3 -0.9
2 GORDEEV Peter D V V V V V V V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
3 CHO Adrian V V V V V V V V V D 2.0 4 +2.0
3 KABA Elias V V V V V V V V V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
5 TARCHICHI Robby D V V V V V V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
6 WU Matthew D V V V V V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
7 ZHANG Jonathan V D V V V D V V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
8 BETTS Jr Anthony P. V D D D D D V V V V V D 4.5 1 -3.5
9 PARKE Nathaniel V V V V V V V V V D 4.3 6 +1.7
10 WANG Devin V V V V V V V V V D 4.6 6 +1.4
11 MITTELSTAEDT Isaiah V V V V V D V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
12 LI Ray V V V V V D V V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
13 XUE Michael V V D V V V V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
14 MOSTOVOY philip V V D V V V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
15 WANG Lucas V D V V V V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
16 LIU Andrew V D V V V D V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
17 CHEN Isaac Zhi V V V V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
18 LI Ryan V V V V V V V V D 3.0 6 +3.0
19 WANG Kaiyan D V V V V V V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
20 BORAN Brooks V V V V V D V V D 3.1 5 +1.9
21 MOU Jaydon V V V V V D V D 3.0 5 +2.0
22 MYRAH Devin V V V V D V V D 2.1 4 +1.9
23 MANSFIELD Hunter D D V V V V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
24 KIM Leejay D V D V V V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
25 ZHAO Jonathan V V V V D D V V D 5.1 4 -1.1
26 WANG Eason D D V V V V V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
27 MA Nolan V D V D V V V D 2.3 3 +0.7
28 CHONG Eden V D D V V D V V D 1.1 3 +1.9
29 CHANG Matthew D V V V D D V V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
30 TOPRANI Valmik D V V V D V V D 1.5 3 +1.5
31 JONES Colby D D V D V V V D 1.1 1 -0.1
32 SAYLOR Henry D V D D D V V D 2.9 1 -1.9
33 ZANKOWSKI Brendan V V V V V V V D 4.2 6 +1.8
34 SONG Aidan V V V V V V V D 2.6 6 +3.4
35 NABAVI Matthew R. V V V V V D V D 4.8 5 +0.2
36 YIN Justin V V V V D V V D 2.6 5 +2.4
37 ZHENG Jason V V D V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
38 BRESLAV Asher V V D V V V 2.2 4 +1.8
39 PARKS-GOOD Tyler V D V D V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
40 VAN RIET Stefan D V V V V D V D 4.0 4 -
41 COPELAND Nigel V V V D V V D 4.8 4 -0.8
43 KNYSH IURII V V V D D V V D 2.1 4 +1.9
44 JONES Gideon V V V D V D V D 2.0 4 +2.0
45 WONG Aaron D V V V D V D 2.6 3 +0.4
46 BANG Dylan V D V D V V V D 2.3 4 +1.7
47 SNELL Andrew J. V V V V D D V D 5.2 4 -1.2
48 WU CHENWEI V V V D V D V D 5.1 4 -1.1
49 CHEN Christopher V D D V V V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
50 KATWAN Adam A. D D V V V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
51 WANG Zhenhao V D V D V V D 0.6 3 +2.4
52 KARLEKAR Veer D V V D V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
53 FUNG SHAUN D V V V D V D 2.2 3 +0.8
54 MCGRATH Sean L. D D V V V V D 4.5 3 -1.5
55 CHUTKAY Pratham V V D V D D V D 4.2 3 -1.2
56 DENG Destin D D D V V V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
57 BHANDARE Veer D V V D D V V D 2.2 3 +0.8
58 SRIKANTH Hariharan V D D D V V V V D 3.0 3 -
60 DOAN Christopher D V D V D V V D 2.4 2 -0.4
61 ZHOU Zhi Matthew V V D D D V V D 2.0 2 -
62 RICHMOND Ozan V D D D V V V D 2.2 2 -0.2
63 FONG Kobe D V D V D D V V D 3.6 2 -1.6
64 RUDIGER George D D D V D V V D 0.8 1 +0.2
65 LI Grayson V V D V D 2.7 3 +0.3
66 LARSON Vaughn D V V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
67 KIM Jeff V V D V V V D 5.4 5 -0.4
68 PENG Ethan V V D V V V D 2.7 5 +2.3
69 RICHARDSON Ray V D V V V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
70 HERDMAN Julian V V V V D V D 2.9 5 +2.1
71 SCHIPPER Johann V V V D V D 2.9 4 +1.1
72 PARRA Lucas D V V V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
73 STRAFFORD Andrew V V V D V D 2.7 4 +1.3
74 KIM Doyun D V V V V D D 3.4 4 +0.6
75 YAO Tristan D V V V D V 3.2 4 +0.8
75 KIM Daniel D V V D V D 1.2 3 +1.8
77 WILSON Benjamin H. V V D V V D D 3.8 4 +0.2
78 CHALLAMEL Hadrien V D D V V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
79 SCHWARTZMAN Ethan V V D D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
79 VOO Lucas V D D V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
81 EPPLER Dominik D V V D V V D 2.1 4 +1.9
82 HERRERA Xavier V D D V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
83 KONG Ethan V V V D D V D 2.8 4 +1.2
84 BALUCAN Caelus V D V D V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
85 WANG Juehan V D D V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
86 FREEMAN Jake Matthew D D V V V D 2.7 3 +0.3
87 SRINIVASAN Sanat Ram V D V V D D 1.8 3 +1.2
88 SEABLOOM Jack V V D D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
89 LAU LUCAS D V V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
90 MCCANDLISH Owen V V D V D D 1.2 3 +1.8
91 ZHANG James D V D V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
92 JOBE Connor V V D D V D 4.1 3 -1.1
93 MCDONNELL Nathaniel V D V D D D 2.8 2 -0.8
94 GOODMAN Liam D V V D V D D 3.8 3 -0.8
95 OR Anson V V D D D V V D 2.2 3 +0.8
96 ARCHIBALD Daniel D D V D V D 3.1 2 -1.1
97 WANG Marcus D D V D V V V D 2.7 3 +0.3
98 RIVERA Louis V V V D D D V D 3.7 3 -0.7
99 LIN John V D D V D V V D 2.1 3 +0.9
100 PRIJATEL John R. V D D D V V V D 5.1 3 -2.1
100 SHOURIE Seth D V V D D V V D 2.3 3 +0.7
102 GAO Ryan V D V D D V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
103 BAGAMANOV Ruslan V D D V V D 2.7 2 -0.7
104 ZHANG Jason D D V D V V D 2.5 2 -0.5
105 GRIGGS Kaiden D D D V D V V D 3.5 2 -1.5
106 QUEENER, IV Henry D V D D D V V D 1.5 2 +0.5
107 ADDLEMAN Joshua D V D D D V V D 3.6 2 -1.6
107 TUNG Charlie D D D D V V V D 2.9 2 -0.9
109 STEPANIAN George D D V V D D V D 1.4 2 +0.6
110 VEERAVALLI Vivek D D D D V V V D 4.3 2 -2.3
111 LIU Xuyao V D V D D D V D 2.6 2 -0.6
112 SAAD Noah V V D D D D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
113 ZHANG Luqi V D D V D D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
114 LEUNG Dylan D D V V D D V D 3.6 2 -1.6
115 LIN Edison D V D V D D V D 0.8 2 +1.2
116 HUANG Max V D D D V D V D 3.0 2 -1.0
117 TANG Michael D V D V D D V D 4.0 2 -2.0
118 QUIRK Dylan D V V D D D V D 3.9 2 -1.9
119 JHUNJHUNWALA Milan V D V D D D V D 2.0 2 -
120 REED David D D D D V V V D 3.8 2 -1.8
121 DU Yiwei V D D D V D 2.5 1 -1.5
122 NOOL Alexander V D D D D D 3.2 1 -2.2
123 KIM Julian D D D V D D V D 3.1 1 -2.1
124 ZENG Felix D D V D D D V D 1.5 1 -0.5
125 YANG Julian D D D D V D V D 1.8 1 -0.8
126 FUNG SCOTT D V D D D D V D 1.0 1 -
127 MEDISETTI Arjun D D D D D D V 1.6 0 -1.6
128 DESAI Aadi D D D D D V D 2.0 0 -2.0
129 ALI Adam V D D V D D 3.0 2 -1.0
130 CARPENTER Touma S. D D V D V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
131 FRIEDMAN Andres V V D D V D D 2.2 3 +0.8
132 MARTIN Malakai V D V D D V D 2.1 3 +0.9
133 KUBBA Sauvil D V D V D 0.6 2 +1.4
134 LEE Daniel D D V V D D 2.9 2 -0.9
135 GRANSTROM Colin V D V D D D 2.7 2 -0.7
136 RAMIREZ Hunter D D V V D D 2.3 2 -0.3
138 AYAR Riley D V D V D D 3.3 2 -1.3
139 MARTHENS Adam F. D V D D D V D 5.5 2 -3.5
140 ZHAN ETHAN D D D V D V D 2.1 2 -0.1
141 PECKENS Tyler D D V D D V D 5.7 2 -3.7
142 ELLIS, IV Floyd D D D V V D D 2.8 2 -0.8
143 TOYOFUKU Lucas D D V D V D D 2.5 2 -0.5
143 THOMAS Andrew V V D D D D D 2.9 2 -0.9
145 SZETO Zachary V D D D V D D 1.5 2 +0.5
146 ALABI Azryl D V D D D V D 2.7 2 -0.7
147 FORTUNA Chase D D D D D 2.2 0 -2.2
148 LI Qiuye D D D D V V D 2.9 2 -0.9
148 SAAD Peter D V D D D V D 2.0 2 -
150 GUO Benjamin V V D D D D D 3.3 2 -1.3
151 LUO Alvin Y. D V D V D D D 0.6 2 +1.4
152 YU Kenneth V V D D D D D 2.3 2 -0.3
153 ZAGRAN Ivan V D V D D D D 1.3 2 +0.7
154 ANDERSON Connor V V D D D D D 0.9 2 +1.1
155 SCORDINSKY Liam D D V D D D 2.1 1 -1.1
155 ATKINS Elan V D D D D D 1.0 1 -
157 ROFINO Samuel D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
158 DANG William D D D D D V D 2.7 1 -1.7
159 RAMIREZ Tristan D D V D D D D 2.1 1 -1.1
160 CAMPBELL Finn V D D D D D D 2.9 1 -1.9
161 WU Jiachen D V D D D D D 2.0 1 -1.0
162 BACON Corban D D V D D D 2.4 1 -1.4
163 SHOURIE Neel D D V D D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
164 HARE Sullivan D D V D D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
165 MAI Carl D. D D D D D V D 3.2 1 -2.2
165 ANDERSON Eric D D D D D V D 2.4 1 -1.4
167 XUE Chenming D D V D D D D 2.5 1 -1.5
168 LEE Ryan D D D V D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
169 ZHU Brady D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
170 CASH William Li D D D D D D D 2.0 0 -2.0
172 SHARMA Aniket D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
173 DOGRUOZ Kuzey D D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0
174 TANEJA ARNAV D D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.