MSA Sports Spot - Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | OZAWA Taishi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% |
| 2 | WANG Freyr | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 29% | |
| 3 | LIN Jun Hui | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 3 | LATORRE Leonardo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% |
| 5 | PAYNE Lynas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 8% |
| 6 | ROUS Miguel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 7% |
| 7 | TAN Charlie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 70% |
| 8 | WENGER Rowan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 6% |
| 9 | CRONK Trevor | 100% | 100% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 10 | ZHAO Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 50% | |
| 11 | JIAO Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 36% | 7% |
| 12 | LINEBERRY CADEN | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
| 13 | AN Jacob | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 14 | WILLIAMS Thomas | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 8% | - |
| 15 | HUANG Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
| 16 | STAMPS Jasper | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 17 | GARCIA Fabricio | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 9% | - |
| 18 | MEI Edan | 100% | 89% | 56% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 19 | RITTER Nathan D. | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 20 | NETESA Lukian | 100% | 74% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
| 21 | DENG Albert | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 6% | - |
| 22 | MATIYASH Andrew | 100% | 83% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 23 | MORGAN Jacob | 100% | 97% | 76% | 33% | 5% | - | |
| 24 | MADDES Gage | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
| 25 | CHASE Crosby | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 26 | ROGGELIN Owen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 12% | 1% |
| 27 | KOSCIK-AQUINO Nicholas | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 28 | TAGORE Ayansh | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 29 | REES Vaughan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 30 | MCGRATH Milo | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 53% | 21% | 4% |
| 31 | THEKKEL Jonathan | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 31 | ZHAI Noah | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | KOUTYCHENKO Andrey | 100% | 87% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | MARVEL Elliot | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 35 | KLINE Benjamin | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 6% | - | |
| 36 | BEDARD Bennett | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 37 | LUND Jonah | 100% | 57% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 38 | LI Jensen | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 39 | CORDERO Lucas | 100% | 74% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
| 40 | ZUIDEMA Harrison | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | CHAISANGUANTHUM Sarit | 100% | 88% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.