MSA Sports Spot - Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | OZAWA Taishi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% |
| 2 | WANG Freyr | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 29% | |
| 3 | LIN Jun Hui | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 3 | LATORRE Leonardo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
| 5 | PAYNE Lynas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 7% |
| 6 | ROUS Miguel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 7% |
| 7 | TAN Charlie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% |
| 8 | WENGER Rowan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 42% | 6% |
| 9 | CRONK Trevor | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
| 10 | ZHAO Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 49% | |
| 11 | JIAO Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 7% |
| 12 | LINEBERRY CADEN | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
| 13 | AN Jacob | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 14 | WILLIAMS Thomas | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 9% | - |
| 15 | HUANG Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 6% |
| 16 | STAMPS Jasper | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 17 | GARCIA Fabricio | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 8% | - |
| 18 | MEI Edan | 100% | 90% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 19 | RITTER Nathan D. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 20 | NETESA Lukian | 100% | 75% | 28% | 4% | - | - | |
| 21 | DENG Albert | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 22 | MATIYASH Andrew | 100% | 85% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 23 | MORGAN Jacob | 100% | 97% | 75% | 32% | 5% | - | |
| 24 | MADDES Gage | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
| 25 | CHASE Crosby | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 26 | ROGGELIN Owen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
| 27 | KOSCIK-AQUINO Nicholas | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 28 | TAGORE Ayansh | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 29 | REES Vaughan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 30 | MCGRATH Milo | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
| 31 | THEKKEL Jonathan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 31 | ZHAI Noah | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 33 | KOUTYCHENKO Andrey | 100% | 86% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | MARVEL Elliot | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | KLINE Benjamin | 100% | 98% | 81% | 40% | 7% | - | |
| 36 | BEDARD Bennett | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 37 | LUND Jonah | 100% | 55% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 38 | LI Jensen | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 39 | CORDERO Lucas | 100% | 74% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
| 40 | ZUIDEMA Harrison | 100% | 80% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | CHAISANGUANTHUM Sarit | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.