Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | FU Nolan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
| 2 | DU Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% | |
| 3 | OLIVAS Joseph | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 5% | |
| 3 | DENG Destin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% |
| 5 | YAO Tristan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% |
| 6 | XUE Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 49% | |
| 7 | OR Anson | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 29% | 6% |
| 8 | KROTZ Nicolas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 17% |
| 9 | WANG Devin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% | |
| 10 | MOSLEY Wally | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 45% | |
| 11 | WONG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 32% | |
| 12 | RONG Marcus | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
| 13 | SAMOYLOV Daniel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 14 | BERTEL Florian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 11% |
| 15 | LIU Daniel | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 16 | PARK Sean | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 17 | ADDLEMAN Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 47% |
| 18 | SCHWARTZMAN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 18% | |
| 19 | SHOURIE Seth | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 20 | NOLAN Morgan | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 21 | TANG Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% | |
| 22 | XIE HanZhang (Elon) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 60% | 14% | |
| 23 | WONG Vansen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 7% | |
| 24 | MARTEGANI Enea | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% | 8% | |
| 25 | CHAN JR Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
| 26 | TOUSSAINT Wizard | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 27 | SUN Jerry | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 28 | NGUYEN Ethan V. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 29 | LUCENAY Samuel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
| 30 | LEE Joshua | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 31 | TENG Eric | 100% | 96% | 68% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 32 | YUN Nicholas | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 33 | DENG Henry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
| 34 | ELARDO Griffin | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 35 | WONG Kyle | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 22% | 3% |
| 36 | LEE Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 30% | |
| 37 | NUGENT Curtis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 51% | 10% | |
| 38 | YOON Ian | 100% | 96% | 74% | 33% | 7% | 1% | |
| 39 | PARRA Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 15% |
| 40 | CHIN NAKAZONO Justin | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 41 | SAMIMI Sina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 34% | 7% |
| 42 | MAI Sy | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 16% | 1% | |
| 43 | KHUSHRAJ Rohan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 14% | |
| 44 | VENERACION Marcus | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 45 | YOO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 6% | |
| 46 | YU Haoyun | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 17% | 1% | |
| 47 | SHOURIE Neel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 2% |
| 48 | SHARMA Aniket | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 49 | YIM Antonio | 100% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 51 | KONG William | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 52 | RAJPRABHU Pranesh | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 53 | LYSENKO Timofei | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 53 | SONG Jonathan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 22% | 2% | |
| 55 | HUANG Eason | 100% | 92% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 56 | GONZALEZ-KUSHNER Elian | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
| 57 | CHIEN Ian | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 58 | GUO Jonathan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 59 | LIU Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
| 60 | GONG Rongtao | 100% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 61 | KOU Mason | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 62 | MA Nolan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 6% | |
| 63 | CHAN Nathan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 65 | TAVERNA Matteo | 100% | 97% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 66 | ENG Kyler | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 13% | |
| 67 | HUNG Ludwig | 100% | 79% | 29% | 3% | - | - | |
| 68 | HERNANDEZ-ALDANA Miguel | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 69 | FONG Ethan | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 70 | LI Connor | 100% | 87% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 71 | GUO OSCAR | 100% | 92% | 56% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 72 | FERRIERE Theo | 100% | 95% | 66% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 72 | ZENG Aidrik | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 74 | KOU Logan | 100% | 57% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 75 | CHU Clayton | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 76 | LIU Aiden | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 77 | ORTMANN Noah | 100% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 78 | LO Stefan | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 79 | YUN Mason | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 80 | ZHAO Luke | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 81 | NOZAWA Luke | 100% | 88% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 82 | TIAN Dylan | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 83 | YE Andrew | 100% | 92% | 55% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 84 | LOUIE Kyle | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 85 | BALDWIN Liam | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 86 | YANG Rony | 100% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.