Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | GALANG Aiden | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 2 | CHEN Donovan | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 3 | LEE Hubert Junhu | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 3 | CHANG Allen | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 5 | JIA Andrew | V V D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 6 | SHETTY Vikram | D V V V V | V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 7 | YANG Collin | V D V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 8 | LEE Albert | V V V V D | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 9 | WU August | V V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 10 | HWANG Noah | D V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 11 | LAM Dylan | D V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 12 | JIANG Hardy | D V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 13 | ANDERSON Bradley | V V D D V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 14 | LI Nathan | D V D V D V | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 15 | QIU Carson | D V D V D | V V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 16 | TAM Ethan | D D D D D | V V D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 17 | YANG Austin | V D V V V V | D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 18 | PAN Wesley | V V V D V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 19 | QIAO Jason | V V V D V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 20 | YAN Kaysen | D V V V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 21 | WOO Jonathan | V V V D V D | D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 22 | GHATTAS August | D V V D V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 23 | FERNANDEZ leo | V D V D V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 24 | WANG Alex | V D D D V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 25 | WANG YUHAO | D D V V D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 26 | HWANG Leo | V D D V D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 27 | JIANG Harry | V V D D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 28 | WAN Andrew | D D D V V D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 29 | LEE Caleb | D D D V D | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 30 | CHENG Daniel | D D D V D | V D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 31 | CHANG Jarrett | V D D D D | V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 32 | KIM Dylan | D V D D D D | V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 33 | HAO Jefferson | V V D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 34 | HORIKAWA Xander | V D V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 35 | JUNG Diego | D D D V D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 36 | XIA Daniel | V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 37 | LEE Damian | D D V D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 38 | WANG Grayson | D D D D V | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 39 | DAVIDSON Ethan | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 40 | ZHANG Jiahang | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 41 | LEUNG Ian | D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 42 | WEN yushuo | D D D D D | D | 2.8 | 0 | -2.8 |
| 43 | NGUYEN Phinix | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.