Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WILSON Ian G. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 2 | MCFARLAND Kai | D D V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 3 | ECKERT Kevin M. | D V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 3 | MOSHIER Calvin | V V V D V V | V V V D | 1.9 | 5 | +3.1 |
| 5 | BENNETT Nathaniel | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 6 | KELLEY Hayden | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 7 | SKLAR Davida | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 8 | YELIZAROV Vladislav | D V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 9 | ASHLEY Logan | V V V V V | V D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
| 10 | ZHANG Qing | V V D V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 11 | ROFINO Samuel | D V V V V | V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 12 | BURNHAM Charlie E. | V D V V V D | V V D | 5.7 | 4 | -1.7 |
| 13 | MOZZER Nolan | D V V D V | V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 14 | OTTAVIANO Aaron | V V D D V | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 15 | RUDIGER George | V D V V D | V V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 16 | BEAULIEU Edmund | V D V D D V | V V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 17 | SONPAL Winslow | V V D V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 18 | HAN Nathan | V V D V V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 19 | KOPPENHEFFER Rowan | V V V D V | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 20 | CHAN Tyler | V V V D V D | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 21 | REELS Eric J. | V V D V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 22 | SONG Aidan | D V D V V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 23 | YEE Charles E. | V D D V V D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 24 | MANN Daniel | D V V D D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 25 | MARSHALL William L. | V V D D V D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 26 | KLOTS Theo | V D V V D D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 27 | FOGEL Jake | V V D D V D | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 28 | GILLARD Adan | D V D V V D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 28 | MITSCH Aubrey | V D V D D V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 30 | WILLIAMS Gavin | V D V D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 31 | RICHARDS Jack | V D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 32 | LARAGY Collin | V D D D D D | V D | 3.7 | 1 | -2.7 |
| 33 | CHALLAMEL Hadrien | D V V D V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 34 | EGHIAN Armen | V D V V D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 35 | PAN Anthony | D D V V D | D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 36 | LEE Harrison | D V V D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 37 | ACHILOV Murod | D D V V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 38 | LIU George | D D D V V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 39 | YAMAUCHI Corbin | D D D D V V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 40 | CULLER Michael (Mike) D. | D V V D D D | D | 4.4 | 2 | -2.4 |
| 41 | DIXON Miles | D D V V D D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 42 | OTTAVIANO Marcus | V D D V D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 43 | ZHENG Yicheng Will | V D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 44 | LU Eric | D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 45 | KAIN Brad | D D D D V | D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 46 | ZHU Brady | D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 47 | LIU Easun | D D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 48 | BARNES Kieron | D D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 49 | VILLARS Philip | D V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 50 | HAMILTON Andrew | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 51 | BROWN Campbell | D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 52 | WORMHOOD Joseph | D D D D D D | D | 2.7 | 0 | -2.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.