Atlantic City Convention Center - Hall D - Atlantic City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHANG Yuchen A. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 2 | CHAKRAPANI Tara | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 3 | KAKANI Aditi | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 44% | 27% | |
| 3 | YU Livia | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 5 | LI Nicole | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 6 | ZHENG Kristen | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 7 | VILLER Alice | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | |
| 8 | KLAUSZ Izabella | - | 1% | 5% | 24% | 45% | 25% | |
| 9 | PINCHUK Yael | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 15% | 2% |
| 10 | SONKU Mira | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% | |
| 11 | CHEN Laila | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 12 | WARD Imani | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 36% | 12% | |
| 13 | PATEL Agena | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 14 | YIN Elaine | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
| 15 | SIU Mila | - | 7% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 4% | |
| 16 | LIU Brinley | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 17 | HAN Emma | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | |
| 18 | YOON Cora | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
| 19 | CHEN Allison | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 29% | |
| 20 | PETROFF Eva | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 41% | 49% |
| 21 | GIORGOBIANI Ketevani | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 5% |
| 22 | HOWARD Katherine | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 20% |
| 23 | FURMAN Elizabeth | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% | |
| 24 | GRUDZINSKI Josephine | 3% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 25 | JIANG chenxi | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 50% | 20% |
| 26 | CHEN Reina | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
| 27 | XIE ANDREA | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
| 28 | PATEL Aria | 3% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 29 | SELASSIE Semara | 1% | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 30 | WANG Katherine | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 31 | KIM Abigail | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 32 | KIM Chaeryeong | 26% | 40% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | SHEN Sophia | 5% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 34 | SULLIVAN Adela | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 35 | NIKOLLA Vivienne | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 36 | GORE Amina | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 37 | JU Jennifer | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 31% | |
| 38 | XU Yunshu | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | CHO Josephine | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 40 | HOCKING Zoe | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 41 | YUSHCHENKO Ivanka | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 42 | CHOI Serine | 20% | 48% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | CHEN Emily | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 44 | BOUTSIKARIS Asha | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 44 | CHANG Hannah | 3% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 46 | BOROTKO Katerina | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 34% |
| 47 | QI Chelsie | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
| 48 | GURTIN Aleksandra | 16% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | CHI Evelyn | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | VAZIRANI Jiya | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 51 | ADEN Aurora | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 52 | LI Rebecca | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 53 | DING Iris Siyue | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
| 54 | DARMAWAN Thea | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 55 | KOGAN Maya | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 56 | KHUDAKIVSKA Ariana | 3% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 57 | KAUR Harjas | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 58 | TAYLOR Daria | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 59 | FEESER Alexia | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 60 | CURTIN Evelyn | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 61 | CHANG Emma | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 62 | LOUGH Abigail | 47% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 63 | KUO Stella | 19% | 39% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 64 | PREDTECHENSKY Alisa | 5% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 65 | ZHANG Anna | 4% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.