Miles Chamley-Watson Cup RYC/RJCC/ROC

Div II Men's Foil

Saturday, March 21, 2026 at 2:00 PM

Atlantic City Convention Center - Hall D - Atlantic City, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 ZOU Aaron - - 1% 7% 27% 43% 22%
2 SUN Henry - 2% 12% 33% 39% 14%
3 SMITH Grant D. - - - 5% 24% 45% 26%
3 WONG Jacob W. - - - 5% 22% 44% 29%
5 CAO Justin - - 1% 5% 22% 43% 30%
6 DEEB Adam - - - - 4% 28% 68%
7 SEIB-LEVINSON Conrad - - 1% 7% 27% 43% 21%
8 PETERSON Lucas - 1% 7% 25% 41% 26%
9 KUO Phineas - 3% 14% 33% 35% 14%
10 SMITH Liam C. - - - - 9% 90%
11 JIMENEZ Naveen - - 1% 10% 32% 41% 17%
12 CHEN Owen - - 2% 11% 32% 39% 16%
13 SHANNON Jack - - 5% 22% 43% 29%
14 LEE Thomas - 1% 10% 30% 39% 18% 2%
15 KOLBINGER Moritz - - 4% 21% 39% 29% 7%
16 GATES Combustion - 4% 18% 36% 32% 10%
17 AGARWAL Savya - 2% 13% 32% 37% 16%
18 CHO Xzander - 1% 6% 24% 40% 25% 5%
18 METZ Mason - - 1% 8% 27% 40% 23%
20 REYES Yannik - 1% 9% 30% 39% 19% 2%
21 KAYE Ben - 1% 9% 29% 39% 20% 2%
22 XING David - 13% 36% 34% 14% 2% -
23 CHOU-ESTEBAN Pau 1% 8% 26% 36% 23% 5%
24 HOLMES Alexiy - - 4% 19% 40% 33% 5%
25 BHATT Jayan 1% 12% 33% 36% 16% 3% -
26 TARCHICHI Robby - - 2% 15% 39% 34% 9%
27 KRECKE Gareth 2% 14% 32% 33% 16% 3%
28 SENANI Arjun - 4% 22% 43% 29% 1%
29 WANG Xicheng 8% 29% 37% 20% 5% -
30 PEREZ Logan 4% 21% 36% 27% 9% 1%
31 KIM Aiden 1% 14% 37% 36% 11% -
32 CHOI Hunter 3% 15% 33% 32% 14% 2%
33 PRICE Owen - - 3% 16% 37% 35% 9%
34 POPESCU Tudor - - - - 5% 30% 64%
35 LAO Kevin - 2% 11% 28% 35% 20% 4%
36 LU Hansen 1% 14% 36% 33% 13% 2% -
37 THOMAS Liam - 3% 15% 34% 34% 13%
39 LUM-DEBONO Alex - - 1% 6% 29% 44% 20%
40 AMEND Jake 2% 16% 37% 33% 11% 1% -
41 GALLER Dave 1% 10% 29% 36% 20% 4%
42 ZHANG Julian 3% 23% 41% 26% 6% -
43 LINDEMANN Conrad 15% 37% 33% 13% 3% -
44 ANGELOS Nico - 1% 10% 31% 38% 18% 2%
44 SANTHOSH Rithwik 2% 17% 35% 31% 12% 2% -
46 SINGH Meet - 5% 19% 35% 29% 10% 1%
47 POLEBOYINA Amrit 1% 6% 23% 36% 25% 8% 1%
48 LIANG Haojia 3% 21% 37% 28% 10% 1% -
49 MCGREEVY Gavin 30% 45% 20% 4% - - -
50 GORLOVITZKI Amitai - 4% 17% 35% 33% 11%
51 SHAW eric 4% 19% 35% 30% 11% 2%
52 TAM Kyle 1% 5% 21% 36% 29% 9%
53 MCENTEE Owen 4% 25% 41% 25% 5% -
54 ZHANG Ethan 3% 23% 40% 26% 7% 1%
55 AMRANI David - 9% 30% 38% 20% 3%
56 KWON Chase 2% 11% 31% 36% 18% 3%
57 CHO Alexander 25% 41% 26% 7% 1% -
58 SMITH Colin 24% 41% 26% 8% 1% -
59 BURAGOHAIN Aiden - 2% 13% 33% 35% 14% 2%
60 GRAY Toby R. 8% 31% 37% 19% 4% - -
61 BALBOA Rolando M. - - < 1% 3% 16% 42% 39%
62 STANSBURY Desmond 1% 10% 31% 36% 18% 4% -
63 ROBERTSON Liam 4% 22% 40% 27% 6% 1% -
64 MORAY Joshua 25% 42% 25% 6% 1% - -
65 YANG David H. - 2% 14% 37% 34% 12% 2%
66 BELOKON Sammy 1% 7% 23% 37% 26% 7%
67 CHAN Geoffrey 2% 21% 40% 28% 8% 1%
68 GODIN Willis 4% 25% 43% 22% 5% - -
69 ZAPPALA Nikolai - 3% 16% 34% 34% 12%
69 SIELSKI Evan 3% 23% 39% 26% 8% 1% -
71 SCHOFIELD Benjamin J. - 3% 16% 33% 31% 14% 2%
72 REN Ryan 27% 41% 24% 7% 1% -
73 SANTIAGO Elias - 1% 10% 28% 36% 21% 4%
74 COULTER Zachary 8% 32% 39% 18% 3% - -
75 KANG Hunter 10% 35% 37% 15% 2% - -
76 LINGAMPALLI Sashank 83% 16% 1% - - - -
77 TARCHICHI Daniel 18% 38% 30% 11% 2% -
78 CARBONELL Ryan 2% 29% 42% 22% 5% - -
79 RAJAT Rivaan 37% 43% 17% 3% - - -
80 FAYVUSOVICH Emmanual 8% 30% 36% 20% 5% 1%
81 KHAW-BRIOT Kai 22% 43% 27% 7% 1% - -
82 ZHANG Vincent J 21% 46% 27% 5% - - -
83 ULYSSE Jacob - 7% 29% 39% 20% 4% -
84 HOE Kenneth Y. 1% 7% 25% 36% 24% 7% 1%
85 FERRONE Nathaniel 2% 16% 37% 33% 11% 1% -
86 MANLAPAZ Jan Vincent 68% 28% 4% - - -
87 XU Lucas 38% 45% 16% 2% - - -
88 POLEPALLI Vinil 10% 32% 36% 18% 4% -
89 HUSOCK Dillon 15% 42% 33% 9% 1% - -
90 GOLDBERG Doran 52% 37% 10% 1% - - -
91 RUPP Keegan E. 54% 36% 9% 1% - -
92 DUCK Raphael 45% 41% 12% 1% - - -
93 DEXTER Zebulon 69% 27% 4% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.