Atlantic City Convention Center - Hall D - Atlantic City, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZOU Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% |
| 2 | SUN Henry | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 14% | |
| 3 | SMITH Grant D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 26% |
| 3 | WONG Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 29% |
| 5 | CAO Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 30% |
| 6 | DEEB Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
| 7 | SEIB-LEVINSON Conrad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% |
| 8 | PETERSON Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% | |
| 9 | KUO Phineas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% | |
| 10 | SMITH Liam C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | |
| 11 | JIMENEZ Naveen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 17% |
| 12 | CHEN Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% |
| 13 | SHANNON Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 29% | |
| 14 | LEE Thomas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 20% | 2% |
| 15 | KOLBINGER Moritz | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 7% |
| 16 | GATES Combustion | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
| 17 | AGARWAL Savya | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% | |
| 18 | CHO Xzander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 29% | 5% |
| 18 | METZ Mason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 23% |
| 20 | REYES Yannik | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 21% | 2% |
| 21 | KAYE Ben | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 22% | 2% |
| 22 | XING David | 100% | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 23 | CHOU-ESTEBAN Pau | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
| 24 | HOLMES Alexiy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 5% |
| 25 | BHATT Jayan | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 26 | TARCHICHI Robby | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 43% | 9% |
| 27 | KRECKE Gareth | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | |
| 28 | SENANI Arjun | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 31% | 1% | |
| 29 | WANG Xicheng | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 30 | PEREZ Logan | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 31 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 99% | 84% | 47% | 11% | - | |
| 32 | CHOI Hunter | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% | |
| 33 | PRICE Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 44% | 9% |
| 34 | POPESCU Tudor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% |
| 35 | LAO Kevin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 36 | LU Hansen | 100% | 99% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 37 | THOMAS Liam | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 13% | |
| 39 | LUM-DEBONO Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 20% |
| 40 | AMEND Jake | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 41 | GALLER Dave | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
| 42 | ZHANG Julian | 100% | 97% | 73% | 32% | 6% | - | |
| 43 | LINDEMANN Conrad | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 44 | ANGELOS Nico | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 19% | 2% |
| 44 | SANTHOSH Rithwik | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 46 | SINGH Meet | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 47 | POLEBOYINA Amrit | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 48 | LIANG Haojia | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 49 | MCGREEVY Gavin | 100% | 70% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 50 | GORLOVITZKI Amitai | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | |
| 51 | SHAW eric | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
| 52 | TAM Kyle | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | |
| 53 | MCENTEE Owen | 100% | 96% | 71% | 30% | 5% | - | |
| 54 | ZHANG Ethan | 100% | 97% | 74% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 55 | AMRANI David | 100% | 100% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 3% | |
| 56 | KWON Chase | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
| 57 | CHO Alexander | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | SMITH Colin | 100% | 76% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 59 | BURAGOHAIN Aiden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 16% | 2% |
| 60 | GRAY Toby R. | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 61 | BALBOA Rolando M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% |
| 62 | STANSBURY Desmond | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 63 | ROBERTSON Liam | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 64 | MORAY Joshua | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 65 | YANG David H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 14% | 2% |
| 66 | BELOKON Sammy | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 7% | |
| 67 | CHAN Geoffrey | 100% | 98% | 77% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 68 | GODIN Willis | 100% | 96% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 69 | ZAPPALA Nikolai | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% | |
| 69 | SIELSKI Evan | 100% | 97% | 74% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 71 | SCHOFIELD Benjamin J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 72 | REN Ryan | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 73 | SANTIAGO Elias | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 74 | COULTER Zachary | 100% | 92% | 60% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 75 | KANG Hunter | 100% | 90% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 76 | LINGAMPALLI Sashank | 100% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 77 | TARCHICHI Daniel | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 78 | CARBONELL Ryan | 100% | 98% | 68% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 79 | RAJAT Rivaan | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 80 | FAYVUSOVICH Emmanual | 100% | 92% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
| 81 | KHAW-BRIOT Kai | 100% | 78% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 82 | ZHANG Vincent J | 100% | 79% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 83 | ULYSSE Jacob | 100% | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 84 | HOE Kenneth Y. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 85 | FERRONE Nathaniel | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 86 | MANLAPAZ Jan Vincent | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 87 | XU Lucas | 100% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 88 | POLEPALLI Vinil | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 89 | HUSOCK Dillon | 100% | 85% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 90 | GOLDBERG Doran | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 91 | RUPP Keegan E. | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 92 | DUCK Raphael | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 93 | DEXTER Zebulon | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.