DC Fencers Club - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ADDYSON Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% |
| 2 | PARY Jean Pierre | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
| 3 | STRAFFORD Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 8% | |
| 3 | ZHOU Luke | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 29% | 3% | |
| 5 | KUYKENDALL Logan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 15% | |
| 6 | WORMACK Andrew | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 7 | SAAD Peter | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 14% |
| 8 | WEI Jayden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 9 | CHUNG Daehyun Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 19% |
| 10 | PARK Jeremy | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 11 | ZHUKOV Egor | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% | |
| 12 | KONG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% |
| 13 | LEE Kate | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | 6% | |
| 14 | WANG Liam | 100% | 100% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 15 | ZHAO Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 3% |
| 16 | FAN Joy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 3% |
| 17 | ZHAO Brandon | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
| 19 | FENG Xinmin | 100% | 97% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 20 | SCHIFFRIN Jonah | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 21 | PAYE Adam Trevor | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 22 | AXELROD Charlotte | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 6% | - | - |
| 23 | SMOTHERS Elias | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 24 | KENNEY Mateo | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 9% | |
| 25 | MILLER Xavier | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 26 | KUYKENDALL Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 27 | KIM Ian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 14% | |
| 28 | VORONIN Zachary | 100% | 99% | 80% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
| 29 | FLUGGE Ned | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 30 | FEELY Samuel | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 31 | CARL-YODER Matthew | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 32 | GALÁRRAGA Ramona | 100% | 98% | 74% | 31% | 6% | - | - |
| 33 | FERNANDEZ ZAMBRANA Rafael Lucas | 100% | 100% | 88% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 33 | BICKLING Edison | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 35 | WANG Jenny | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | YEALDHALL Griffin | 100% | 38% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
| 37 | PELUSI Mileva | 100% | 97% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 38 | DU Lindsay | 100% | 95% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | TADROS Laila | 100% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | POLAGANI Krishiv | 100% | 98% | 69% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 41 | HEATHERMAN GARBER Thea | 100% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.