George Mason Recreational Athletics Complex (RAC) - Fairfax, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KOENIGSBERG Jared | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
| 2 | NGUYEN Anna | V V V D D V | V V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 3 | SHIMER Joseph (Joey) D. | V D V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 3 | MITCHELL Matthew | D V D D V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 5 | HOWERTON Beckett | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 6 | +3.0 |
| 6 | DADIO Daniel | V V V V V V | V V D | 2.3 | 6 | +3.7 |
| 7 | CEDENO Andres | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 8 | JAFAR Abdullah | V D D D V D | V V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 9 | HEANEY Sam | V V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 10 | WANG Ziyao | V V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 11 | KANE Kiran | V V V V D V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 12 | MARKOWITZ Jonathan | V V D V D V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 13 | YAMATANI Michael | V V V D D V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 14 | RACHAPROLU Divyagnyaan Siddartha | D V V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 15 | STEVENS Chrysanthi Z. | V D D D V V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 16 | BUYUCCAN Jonah | D V D V D D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 17 | SONG Zhihao | V V V D V D | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 18 | SISSAC Samya | V D V V V D | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 19 | SILK Ryan | D V D D V V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 20 | RUBIATO Lawrence | D D V V D V | D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 21 | LAUDO Joseph | D V D V D V | D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 22 | NGUYEN Bryce | V D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 23 | ZHOU Deborah | V D D V D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 24 | GAVALAS Daniella | D V D D D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 25 | GOSNELL James | V V D D D D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 26 | NGUYEN Minh | D D V D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 26 | KWIATKOWSKI Matthew | D D V D D V | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 28 | RIVABEM William | D D D V V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 29 | CRUZ Isabel | D D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 30 | URIBE David | D D D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 31 | SWANN Juliet | D D D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 32 | MARTIN Audrey | D D D D D D | V D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 33 | JOSHI Sanika | D D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 34 | MIR Ismael | D D D V D D | D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
| 35 | WIZEMAN Nathan | D D D D D D | D | 2.8 | 0 | -2.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.