Atlantic City Convention Center - Atlantic City, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ADYANTHAYA Anika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% | |
| 2 | LEE Eden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
| 3 | YU Livia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
| 3 | MENG YIFAN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% | |
| 5 | SHAYAKHMETOVA Suzanna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
| 6 | SHEIKH PAREE | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 5% |
| 7 | YANAGIDA Coco | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 8 | KOUAME Candice | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% |
| 9 | BOROTKO Katerina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% | |
| 10 | XIAO Katelyn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% | |
| 11 | ZHANG Ashley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 12 | WONG Sydney | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 13 | GIORGOBIANI Ketevani | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 2% | |
| 14 | SHETH Anayaà | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 6% | |
| 15 | CHEN Alina | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 14% | |
| 16 | ZHANG Flora | 100% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 17 | JU Jennifer | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 4% |
| 18 | YIN Elaine | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
| 19 | WEI Sherry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 29% |
| 20 | KAKANI Aditi | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
| 21 | IVANOV Angela-Sophie | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 22 | BROWN Marie | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
| 23 | CHOI Arianna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
| 25 | ZHENG Kristen | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 7% | - | |
| 26 | GOTSABINA Elizabeth | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | LAW Mila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% |
| 28 | CHEN Laila | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 29 | BURROWS Beatrice | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 10% | |
| 30 | CHERNOBRIVETS Maria | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
| 31 | LIU Lillian | 100% | 95% | 70% | 29% | 5% | - | |
| 33 | KONG Mila W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% |
| 34 | MAEDJE Abigail | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 35 | JEYOON Lauren | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% | |
| 36 | YOON Cora | 100% | 88% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 37 | GORE Amina | 100% | 92% | 61% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 38 | ORDORICA Abra | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 39 | FURMAN Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 40 | LEE Kate | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
| 40 | HAN Emma | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 42 | FAN Joy | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 3% | |
| 43 | MEGGERS Arya | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 44 | CHAKRAPANI Tara | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 45 | SELASSIE Semara | 100% | 81% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | GOPU Jyothirvida | 100% | 93% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 47 | PARK Suhjee | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 48 | KHUDAKIVSKA Ariana | 100% | 74% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | ZHENG Erin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | |
| 50 | YOUNG Penelope | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 51 | ZHANG Sophia | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 52 | JOHN Elsa | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 53 | DATSON Mia | 100% | 89% | 35% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | CHO Josephine | 100% | 78% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | PAREKH Riana | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | CABRERA QUINTANA Lucrecia | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 57 | SAJJA Anwita | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | CLERMONT Chloe | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 59 | ILYAS Lyla | 100% | 60% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 60 | ANDERSON Brooke | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 61 | LEUNG Morgan | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.