Floyd Little Athletic Center - New Haven, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | XIAN kevin | V V V V V | V V V V V | 0.0 | 5 | +5.0 |
| 2 | ZHONG Kingsley | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 0.0 | 6 | +6.0 |
| 3 | HU Michael | V V V V V V | V V V D | 0.0 | 6 | +6.0 |
| 3 | CAO Aaron | V V V V V V | V V V D | 0.0 | 6 | +6.0 |
| 5 | ZHANG Eric | V V V V V V | V V D | 0.0 | 6 | +6.0 |
| 6 | LIN Lucas | V V V V V V | V V D | 0.0 | 6 | +6.0 |
| 7 | GUGALA Frank | V V V V V V | V V D | 0.0 | 6 | +6.0 |
| 8 | SHARMA Ari | V V V V V | V V D | 0.0 | 5 | +5.0 |
| 9 | TIAN Andy | D V V V V V | V D | 0.0 | 5 | +5.0 |
| 10 | PELLERIN Liam | V V D V V V | V V D | 0.0 | 5 | +5.0 |
| 10 | WU Yulen | D V V V V V | V V D | 0.0 | 5 | +5.0 |
| 12 | FANG Ryan | V D V V V V | V V D | 0.0 | 5 | +5.0 |
| 13 | XIA Vincent | V V V V D V | V V D | 0.0 | 5 | +5.0 |
| 14 | XIA Wenhao | V V V D V | V V D | 0.0 | 4 | +4.0 |
| 15 | FOMIN Dash | D V V V V | V D | 0.0 | 4 | +4.0 |
| 16 | YANG Luca | V V D D V V | V V D | 0.0 | 4 | +4.0 |
| 17 | CHEN Keegan | V V V D V V | V D | 0.0 | 5 | +5.0 |
| 18 | ZHAO David | V V V D D V | V D | 0.0 | 4 | +4.0 |
| 19 | TARDIFF Owen | V V V D V D | V D | 0.0 | 4 | +4.0 |
| 20 | DEL VALLE-LIN Julian | D V V V V D | V D | 0.0 | 4 | +4.0 |
| 21 | HAN Jiaren | V V V V D D | V D | 0.0 | 4 | +4.0 |
| 22 | YU Adam | V V D V D | V D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
| 23 | GENG Vincent | D V V V D V | V D | 0.0 | 4 | +4.0 |
| 24 | MOON Nolan | V V V D D | V D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
| 25 | BRYSON Aidan | V D D D V | V D | 0.0 | 2 | +2.0 |
| 26 | LU Ethan | D V V D D V | V D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
| 27 | LEE Ryan | D D V V V D | V D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
| 28 | BRADY David | D V V V D D | V D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
| 29 | SAVIR Ethan | V D D V D D | V D | 0.0 | 2 | +2.0 |
| 30 | LEONG Michael | D V D D V D | V D | 0.0 | 2 | +2.0 |
| 31 | WANG Timothy | D D D V D | V D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
| 32 | STARK Ethan | D V D V D D | V D | 0.0 | 2 | +2.0 |
| 33 | RENSHAW Hunter | V D V D D V | D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
| 34 | ZHANG Andrew | V D D V D | D | 0.0 | 2 | +2.0 |
| 35 | BERLOW Hudson | V D V D D D | D | 0.0 | 2 | +2.0 |
| 36 | KISHAN Samridh | V V D D D D | D | 0.0 | 2 | +2.0 |
| 37 | WANG Grant | D D D D V V | D | 0.0 | 2 | +2.0 |
| 38 | HO Marcus | V D D D D V | D | 0.0 | 2 | +2.0 |
| 39 | THAKKAR Advait | D D D D V | D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
| 40 | AWALGAONKAR Aahan | D D D D V D | D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
| 41 | ZHANG Tingrui | D D D D V D | D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
| 42 | JUTAGIR Eugene | D D D D D V | D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
| 43 | CUI Jason | D D V D D D | D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
| 44 | RICE Henry | D D D D D V | D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
| 45 | ZHU Winston | D D D D V D | D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
| 46 | SALERNO A.J. | D D D D V D | D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
| 47 | HWANG Samuel | D D V D D D | D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
| 48 | KAZAKOV Alexander | V D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
| 50 | CHEN Jonathan | D D D V D D | D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
| 51 | LIU Max | D D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
| 52 | LI Ethan | D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
| 53 | ZEI Julian | D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
| 54 | CAI Charlie | D D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
| 55 | LEE Elijah | D D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.