Freehold Fencing Academy - Freehold, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SHAFAIE Ali | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 40% | 27% |
2 | LIU Eric | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 2% |
3 | SHAFAIE Kaveh | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 48% | 25% |
3 | HU Robin | 1% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
5 | O'BRIEN Jack | - | 2% | 9% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
6 | ZELTSER Lawrence | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
7 | REZNICK Nicholas J. | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
8 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
9 | MILLER Andrew | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
10 | PATEL Anika T. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
11 | MANGE Nathan | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 7% |
12 | DESOLA Aidan | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | 1% | - |
13 | MANGE Andrew | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
14 | PETERS Nathan M. | - | 2% | 10% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 7% |
15 | MILLER Trent | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
16 | MAHON Jacob | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
17 | MATHEWS Rocco | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
18 | HEISER Anna Marie | 19% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
19 | DAUM Charlie | 15% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | 1% | - |
20 | MA Toby | 9% | 37% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
21 | ZHANG Bill | 10% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.