Freehold Fencing Academy - Freehold, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHAFAIE Ali | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 27% |
| 2 | LIU Eric | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 20% | 2% |
| 3 | SHAFAIE Kaveh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 25% |
| 3 | HU Robin | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 5 | O'BRIEN Jack | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 33% | 7% |
| 6 | ZELTSER Lawrence | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 7 | REZNICK Nicholas J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 53% | 21% | 4% |
| 8 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 9 | MILLER Andrew | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 10 | PATEL Anika T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
| 11 | MANGE Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
| 12 | DESOLA Aidan | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 13 | MANGE Andrew | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 14 | PETERS Nathan M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 64% | 30% | 7% |
| 15 | MILLER Trent | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 16 | MAHON Jacob | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 17 | MATHEWS Rocco | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 18 | HEISER Anna Marie | 100% | 81% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 19 | DAUM Charlie | 100% | 85% | 51% | 20% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 20 | MA Toby | 100% | 91% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 21 | ZHANG Bill | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.