MAPLEWOOD, NJ - MAPLEWOOD, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KIM Rachael | V D V V V | V V V V V | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 2 | CHUSID Renata M. | V V V V V D | V V V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 3 | BREKER Anika | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 3 | CHEN Jia P. | V D V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 5 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | V V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 6 | WANG Ellen | V V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 7 | KOKES Gabrielle | D V V V D | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 8 | LI Meilin | D V D D D | V V V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 9 | SADAN Jordan E. | V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 10 | RENTON Samantha | V V V V V | V D | 2.3 | 5 | +2.7 |
| 11 | CHEN Jessie S. | D V V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 12 | HOOSHI Erica S. | V D V V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 13 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | V V V D V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 14 | DAVIA Daniella V. | V D V D V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 15 | MASSICK Laine | V D V D V | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 16 | YUGOV Elizabeth (Liz Yugov) | D D V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 17 | VEERKAMP Molly | V V V V V | D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 18 | LEVI Lea | V V D V V | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 19 | HE Fenghuan | V D V D V V | D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 20 | SHAW Kayla M. | D V V V D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 21 | XUE Alanna | V V D V D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 22 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | D V V D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 23 | PATEL Anika | D V V V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 24 | LI Rachel Y. | V V D D D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 25 | XU Madison | D D D V V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 26 | YU Jaime L. | D V D V D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 27 | LIN Ashley | V V D D D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 28 | HOLLE Aviella S. | V D D V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 29 | HUANG Natalie | D V D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 30 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | D D V D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 31 | PAVE Claire | D V D D D | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 32 | LIU Sophia | D D D D D | V D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 33 | CHEN Kelly | D D V D V | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 34 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 35 | WU Julianna Y. | D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 36 | HEISER Anna M. | V D D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 37 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | D D D D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 38 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | D V D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 39 | SU Michelle | V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 40 | WEBB Ella | D D D V D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 41 | FU Qihan | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 42 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 43 | GUO Jessica | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.