MAPLEWOOD, NJ - MAPLEWOOD, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KIM Rachael | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 21% | |
2 | CHUSID Renata M. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 56% |
3 | BREKER Anika | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 44% | 26% | |
3 | CHEN Jia P. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 22% | |
5 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 7% | |
6 | WANG Ellen | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 19% | |
7 | KOKES Gabrielle | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 22% | |
8 | LI Meilin | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
9 | SADAN Jordan E. | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 15% | |
10 | RENTON Samantha | 2% | 16% | 45% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
11 | CHEN Jessie S. | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
12 | HOOSHI Erica S. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% | |
13 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 6% | - |
14 | DAVIA Daniella V. | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | |
15 | MASSICK Laine | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% | |
16 | YUGOV Elizabeth (Liz Yugov) | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 40% | 13% | |
17 | VEERKAMP Molly | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 2% | |
18 | LEVI Lea | - | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 33% | |
19 | HE Fenghuan | - | - | 2% | 11% | 35% | 42% | 11% |
20 | SHAW Kayla M. | - | 2% | 14% | 39% | 36% | 10% | |
21 | XUE Alanna | 2% | 16% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
22 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 7% | |
23 | PATEL Anika | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
24 | LI Rachel Y. | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
25 | XU Madison | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
26 | YU Jaime L. | 10% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | |
27 | LIN Ashley | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% | |
28 | HOLLE Aviella S. | 1% | 12% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
29 | HUANG Natalie | - | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
30 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
31 | PAVE Claire | 36% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
32 | LIU Sophia | 22% | 46% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
33 | CHEN Kelly | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 6% | |
34 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 21% | 45% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
35 | WU Julianna Y. | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | |
36 | HEISER Anna M. | 48% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
37 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 41% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
38 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 34% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
39 | SU Michelle | 6% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | |
40 | WEBB Ella | 1% | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
41 | FU Qihan | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
42 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 22% | 51% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
43 | GUO Jessica | 91% | 8% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.