MAPLEWOOD, NJ - MAPLEWOOD, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KULKARNI Diya | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% |
| 2 | LIN Katie Y. | - | - | < 1% | 6% | 27% | 44% | 23% |
| 3 | NING Emma | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% |
| 3 | XU Grace (XinYi) | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% |
| 5 | PATURU Meghana | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
| 6 | ZHANG Maya | - | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% |
| 7 | BLIN Margaux J. | 1% | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 8 | NI Emma | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% |
| 9 | WANG anne | - | - | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% |
| 10 | COBERT Helen G. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% |
| 11 | MUTAKABBIR amira | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 12 | EBRAHIM Ameera H. | - | 1% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 13 | KOKES Ava | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 14 | CHOI Lyla | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
| 15 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 18% |
| 16 | YOON Julia J. | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 17 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | - | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
| 18 | ZHANG Tina | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 19 | MEHROTRA Anya | - | 2% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 20 | MAO Amy | 3% | 18% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 21 | SIDDIQUI Ammna K. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 22 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% |
| 23 | SMUK Daria A. | - | 1% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 23 | CHANG Ella | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 25 | LONG Cindy | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 26 | SAAL Anna | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 27 | HILL Phoebe | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 28 | ZAKHAROV Anne E. | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 29 | MINOR Lindsey | - | - | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 30 | MING Cynthia | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | ZENG Katrina | 12% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | BELAOUSSOFF Kira | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 33 | GAO Judy | - | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 34 | DE JAGER Celine | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 35 | PAN Michelle | - | 5% | 24% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 36 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 37 | YAO Jillian | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 38 | CHAN Elizabeth | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 39 | KIM Rachael | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% |
| 40 | LIN Julia L. | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 41 | HONG Elaine | 19% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | MOK Chloe R. | 15% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | DENG Annie | 8% | 35% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | PATEL Viha | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 45 | GUZZI Jordan | 49% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 46 | SINGH Aayushi | 28% | 63% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
| 47 | FALLON Kyle R. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 48 | BONAR Natalia | 18% | 49% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | HICKS Grace | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | MATHIS Katherine | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | ABRAMSON Liliana M. | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | 12% | 40% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | THOMAS Angeline | 65% | 33% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 54 | HOSANAGAR Inchara | 32% | 48% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 55 | LI Alisha | 5% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 55 | ZISCHKE Alexandra A. | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.