MAPLEWOOD, NJ - MAPLEWOOD, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KULKARNI Diya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% |
| 2 | LIN Katie Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 23% |
| 3 | NING Emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% |
| 3 | XU Grace (XinYi) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% |
| 5 | PATURU Meghana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
| 6 | ZHANG Maya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% |
| 7 | BLIN Margaux J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 8 | NI Emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 13% |
| 9 | WANG anne | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% |
| 10 | COBERT Helen G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% |
| 11 | MUTAKABBIR amira | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
| 12 | EBRAHIM Ameera H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 80% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 13 | KOKES Ava | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 14 | CHOI Lyla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 19% |
| 15 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 18% |
| 16 | YOON Julia J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% |
| 17 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 11% |
| 18 | ZHANG Tina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
| 19 | MEHROTRA Anya | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
| 20 | MAO Amy | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 21 | SIDDIQUI Ammna K. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 22 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 14% |
| 23 | SMUK Daria A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 23 | CHANG Ella | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 25 | LONG Cindy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
| 26 | SAAL Anna | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 27 | HILL Phoebe | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 28 | ZAKHAROV Anne E. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 29 | MINOR Lindsey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
| 30 | MING Cynthia | 100% | 70% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | ZENG Katrina | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 32 | BELAOUSSOFF Kira | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 33 | GAO Judy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
| 34 | DE JAGER Celine | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 35 | PAN Michelle | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 36 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
| 37 | YAO Jillian | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 38 | CHAN Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
| 39 | KIM Rachael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 11% |
| 40 | LIN Julia L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 41 | HONG Elaine | 100% | 81% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | MOK Chloe R. | 100% | 85% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | DENG Annie | 100% | 92% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | PATEL Viha | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 45 | GUZZI Jordan | 100% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 46 | SINGH Aayushi | 100% | 72% | 9% | - | - | - | - |
| 47 | FALLON Kyle R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 48 | BONAR Natalia | 100% | 82% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | HICKS Grace | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | MATHIS Katherine | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | ABRAMSON Liliana M. | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | 100% | 88% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | THOMAS Angeline | 100% | 35% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 54 | HOSANAGAR Inchara | 100% | 68% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 55 | LI Alisha | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 55 | ZISCHKE Alexandra A. | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.