MAPLEWOOD, NJ - MAPLEWOOD, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WILLIAMS Nolan E. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% |
| 2 | LEVIN Mark A. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 43% | 18% | |
| 3 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% | |
| 3 | YEN Preston | - | - | 4% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 7% |
| 5 | LEMPERT Levy A. | - | 3% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 6 | KIM Minwook | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% |
| 7 | CHEN Leo | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 8 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | |
| 9 | GEFELL Andrew P. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% |
| 10 | HARRIS Alex K. | - | 12% | 37% | 38% | 13% | ||
| 11 | KEEFE Duncan | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 12 | SKINNER Graham B. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% |
| 13 | FISK Ethan | 3% | 20% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 14 | WIND Nicky E. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% | |
| 15 | COLE Alexander | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 4% |
| 16 | LO Alexander | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 17 | MAHONEY Colin M. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 18 | MENSAH Kennedy C | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | |
| 19 | HONG Vincent Q. | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 20 | WILSON Jude | - | 3% | 20% | 46% | 31% | ||
| 21 | SHIMER Joseph (Joey) D. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | |
| 22 | HUANG Ethan F. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | |
| 23 | MARTINEZ Justin | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 24 | GREENE Alexander J. | 1% | 13% | 40% | 36% | 10% | ||
| 25 | EDELMAN Seth A. | 1% | 8% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 26 | LI Junyou | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 3% |
| 27 | LIU Kelly | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 4% | |
| 28 | KAPLAN Liam | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | GRYCIUK Koby | 34% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 30 | LI Minghan | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 31 | SHTEYN Mark | 1% | 12% | 36% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 32 | QIN Alexander | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 33 | LEUNG Andrew K. | 29% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 34 | VAROQUA Tolby | 10% | 37% | 38% | 14% | 1% | ||
| 35 | DENG Andrew | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 36 | HU Andrew | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 37 | OVERDECK Andrew | 10% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | CLYMER Lucas Y. | - | 2% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 39 | HUANG Tyler T. | 19% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 40 | ZHUANG Rayken | 61% | 35% | 4% | - | - | ||
| 41 | ZHENG Edward L. | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 42 | XIAO Ethan | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | MOULTON Ian | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 44 | KULKARNI Rohan | 50% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.