MAPLEWOOD, NJ - MAPLEWOOD, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WILLIAMS Nolan E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% |
2 | LEVIN Mark A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 18% | |
3 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% | |
3 | YEN Preston | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 7% |
5 | LEMPERT Levy A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
6 | KIM Minwook | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% |
7 | CHEN Leo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
8 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 10% | |
9 | GEFELL Andrew P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% |
10 | HARRIS Alex K. | 100% | 100% | 87% | 51% | 13% | ||
11 | KEEFE Duncan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
12 | SKINNER Graham B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% |
13 | FISK Ethan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
14 | WIND Nicky E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% | |
15 | COLE Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 4% |
16 | LO Alexander | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | |
17 | MAHONEY Colin M. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% | |
18 | MENSAH Kennedy C | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% | |
19 | HONG Vincent Q. | 100% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
20 | WILSON Jude | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 31% | ||
21 | SHIMER Joseph (Joey) D. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% | |
22 | HUANG Ethan F. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% | |
23 | MARTINEZ Justin | 100% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | |
24 | GREENE Alexander J. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 46% | 10% | ||
25 | EDELMAN Seth A. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - |
26 | LI Junyou | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 20% | 3% |
27 | LIU Kelly | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 4% | |
28 | KAPLAN Liam | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | |
29 | GRYCIUK Koby | 100% | 66% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
30 | LI Minghan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
31 | SHTEYN Mark | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - |
32 | QIN Alexander | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
33 | LEUNG Andrew K. | 100% | 71% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
34 | VAROQUA Tolby | 100% | 90% | 53% | 15% | 1% | ||
35 | DENG Andrew | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 7% | 1% | |
36 | HU Andrew | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
37 | OVERDECK Andrew | 100% | 90% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
38 | CLYMER Lucas Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
39 | HUANG Tyler T. | 100% | 81% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | |
40 | ZHUANG Rayken | 100% | 39% | 4% | - | - | ||
41 | ZHENG Edward L. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
42 | XIAO Ethan | 100% | 86% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
43 | MOULTON Ian | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
44 | KULKARNI Rohan | 100% | 50% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.