Twin Cities Fencing Club - St. Paul, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | KROPP Jack | - | - | - | 48% | 42% | 10% |
| 2 | TOLLEFSON Zachary | - | - | 2% | 18% | 51% | 28% |
| 3 | OZANNE Jeffrey S. | - | - | 8% | 33% | 45% | 14% |
| 3 | CHO Joseph | - | 4% | 23% | 46% | 27% | |
| 5 | TAKATA Benjamin | 2% | 15% | 44% | 39% | ||
| 6 | PERLENFEIN Tyler J. | - | 3% | 21% | 45% | 27% | 3% |
| 7 | DRAWZ Chase | 29% | 49% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 8 | LIMER Avi | - | 5% | 26% | 46% | 23% | |
| 9 | PREIDL Matthias | 22% | 47% | 27% | 4% | ||
| 10 | KUNJAN Lena R. | - | - | - | 2% | 33% | 65% |
| 11 | SOTO Michael | 29% | 46% | 22% | 3% | ||
| 12 | YATES Graeme | 3% | 23% | 45% | 26% | 4% | |
| 13 | BISSEN Quinn | 1% | 13% | 41% | 35% | 9% | |
| 14 | OBERLY Nicholas | - | - | 5% | 33% | 61% | |
| 15 | LEUNG Matthias | 12% | 37% | 38% | 13% | - | - |
| 16 | PETERSON Penelope | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 17 | SANFORD Wesley | - | 4% | 33% | 50% | 12% | |
| 18 | LEE Wilson | 11% | 36% | 38% | 15% | 1% | - |
| 19 | BENGTSON Jasmine | 10% | 36% | 39% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 20 | CAVEN Emerald | 17% | 45% | 33% | 5% | - | - |
| 21 | HONEK Kyle | 1% | 9% | 40% | 39% | 12% | - |
| 22 | ROBBINS Christopher (Chris) W. | 8% | 33% | 43% | 16% | ||
| 23 | STOLTZ Chase | - | 4% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% |
| 24 | JORGENSEN Kjirsten | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 24 | MINGO Ron | 1% | 20% | 44% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 26 | AURÈLIUS Adel | - | - | 1% | 14% | 44% | 41% |
| 27 | JOHN Elsa | 61% | 34% | 5% | - | - | |
| 28 | RUBIN Joshua | 37% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | WILLER Ryan | 17% | 41% | 33% | 9% | - | - |
| 31 | JORGENSEN Rebekah | 14% | 51% | 31% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | TELCI Arya | 17% | 41% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 33 | MIEST Davis | 37% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.