Escondido, CA - Escondido, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WINKLER Lucas G. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 36% |
| 2 | BREIER Satchel E. | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 33% |
| 3 | CAPPELLUTI Ryan M. | - | - | - | 4% | 32% | 63% | |
| 3 | LIU David J. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% | |
| 5 | BERGER Oliver | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 6 | JIANG Anthony | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% | |
| 7 | BARBER William S. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 43% | 13% |
| 8 | CASTRO-SOLIS HUGO ABEL | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 45% | 18% | |
| 9 | LE Hayden | - | - | 1% | 13% | 40% | 36% | 9% |
| 10 | OSUNA RICARDO | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 11 | KIM Andrew H. | - | - | 7% | 30% | 46% | 17% | |
| 12 | FRIAS SAUL F. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% | |
| 13 | REYES Xavier M. | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 48% | 13% | |
| 14 | NOBLE Daniel | - | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 15 | CHANG Colin S. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 5% |
| 16 | RAJA Arnav | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 12% | |
| 17 | WANG Eric Y. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 47% |
| 18 | ALKIN Isaac | 1% | 12% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
| 19 | LEITH Jack | 5% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 20 | TIEU Ethan | - | 3% | 21% | 43% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 21 | TANG Alex Y. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 43% | 16% |
| 22 | MATSUI Alen K. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 14% |
| 23 | AVAKIAN Alec | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 32% | 6% |
| 24 | KIM Noah L. | 1% | 8% | 38% | 39% | 13% | 1% | |
| 25 | BOUANANI Zachariah I. | 1% | 12% | 39% | 35% | 11% | 1% | |
| 26 | ZUBATIY Samuel | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 27 | HASNAH Henry | - | 5% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 4% | |
| 28 | CHEN Lucas B. | - | 3% | 24% | 44% | 24% | 4% | |
| 29 | VILLA-KOWAL Ivan H. | 5% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 30 | LIKER Maxim J. | 22% | 47% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 31 | HAWKINS Jasper R. | 53% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 32 | YEARLING Matthew | - | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 4% | |
| 33 | LEUNG Nathan | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 34 | BRISTOL Brijen | 15% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | KORINTH Alexander J. | 4% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 6% | - | - |
| 36 | SHI Kyle | 5% | 32% | 44% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | TANN Justin | - | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 38 | TAN Darren | 1% | 13% | 38% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 39 | BAILEY Nate | 7% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 40 | REED Samuel J. | 16% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | CHANIN Liam R. | 37% | 44% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 42 | WALLACE Taylor | 52% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 43 | SONG RYAN | 6% | 35% | 41% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | VAUGHN Justin T. | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 45 | HODGES Calvin | 6% | 37% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | WILLIAMS Rhiley | 84% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 47 | MOLINARI Luke M. | 52% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 48 | VO Minh Q. | 17% | 49% | 28% | 6% | - | - | |
| 48 | YEARLING Ethan | 23% | 56% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 50 | PADOS Tamas | 64% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 50 | ZHAO Aaron | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 52 | STONE Esmond A. | 2% | 37% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.