Escondido, CA - Escondido, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WINKLER Lucas G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% |
2 | BREIER Satchel E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 33% |
3 | CAPPELLUTI Ryan M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% | |
3 | LIU David J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% | |
5 | BERGER Oliver | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
6 | JIANG Anthony | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | |
7 | BARBER William S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% | 13% |
8 | CASTRO-SOLIS HUGO ABEL | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 18% | |
9 | LE Hayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 46% | 9% |
10 | OSUNA RICARDO | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
11 | KIM Andrew H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 62% | 17% | |
12 | FRIAS SAUL F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | |
13 | REYES Xavier M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 13% | |
14 | NOBLE Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
15 | CHANG Colin S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 32% | 5% |
16 | RAJA Arnav | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 12% | |
17 | WANG Eric Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 47% |
18 | ALKIN Isaac | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 17% | 2% | |
19 | LEITH Jack | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 6% | - | - |
20 | TIEU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 32% | 6% | - |
21 | TANG Alex Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 16% |
22 | MATSUI Alen K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 14% |
23 | AVAKIAN Alec | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% | 6% |
24 | KIM Noah L. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% | 15% | 1% | |
25 | BOUANANI Zachariah I. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | 12% | 1% | |
26 | ZUBATIY Samuel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
27 | HASNAH Henry | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 26% | 4% | |
28 | CHEN Lucas B. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | 28% | 4% | |
29 | VILLA-KOWAL Ivan H. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 5% | - | |
30 | LIKER Maxim J. | 100% | 78% | 31% | 6% | - | - | |
31 | HAWKINS Jasper R. | 100% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
32 | YEARLING Matthew | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 28% | 4% | |
33 | LEUNG Nathan | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
34 | BRISTOL Brijen | 100% | 85% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - | |
35 | KORINTH Alexander J. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 6% | - | - |
36 | SHI Kyle | 100% | 95% | 63% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
37 | TANN Justin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
38 | TAN Darren | 100% | 99% | 86% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - |
39 | BAILEY Nate | 100% | 93% | 66% | 26% | 4% | - | |
40 | REED Samuel J. | 100% | 84% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | |
41 | CHANIN Liam R. | 100% | 63% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
42 | WALLACE Taylor | 100% | 48% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
43 | SONG RYAN | 100% | 94% | 59% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
44 | VAUGHN Justin T. | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
45 | HODGES Calvin | 100% | 94% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
46 | WILLIAMS Rhiley | 100% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
47 | MOLINARI Luke M. | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
48 | VO Minh Q. | 100% | 83% | 34% | 6% | - | - | |
48 | YEARLING Ethan | 100% | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | |
50 | PADOS Tamas | 100% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
50 | ZHAO Aaron | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
52 | STONE Esmond A. | 100% | 98% | 61% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.