American Challenge RJCC/RYC

Junior Women's Épée

Sunday, April 19, 2026 at 8:00 AM

Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LEE Claire - - - - 2% 19% 80%
2 ADYANTHAYA Anika - - - 2% 13% 39% 46%
3 LI Caroline - - - 2% 15% 42% 41%
3 MENG YIFAN - - - 5% 20% 42% 33%
5 PRESMAN Aerin - - - 4% 18% 41% 37%
6 FURMAN Maria - - - - 5% 30% 65%
7 HOAGLAND Sally - 2% 10% 28% 38% 20% 1%
8 GIORGOBIANI Ketevani 1% 11% 28% 34% 20% 6% 1%
9 WANG Cecilia - 1% 6% 20% 35% 29% 9%
10 LI Alice - 1% 6% 21% 35% 28% 8%
11 KLAUSZ Izabella - 2% 10% 28% 36% 21% 4%
12 BURROWS Beatrice - 2% 12% 31% 35% 17% 3%
13 SUICO Kyubi Emmanuelle - - 2% 11% 31% 39% 18%
14 KAUR Manroop - - 1% 5% 25% 45% 24%
15 PETROFF Eva - - 5% 19% 35% 31% 10%
16 ZOU You yang (Yoyo) - 5% 20% 35% 28% 10% 1%
17 CHEN Ava - 3% 14% 31% 33% 16% 2%
18 ZHU Una - 2% 13% 31% 34% 17% 3%
19 KAKANI Aditi - 1% 10% 31% 38% 17% 2%
20 VENKATESAN Harshitha - 1% 9% 26% 36% 22% 5%
21 YU Eva - 4% 18% 35% 30% 12% 1%
22 LAW Mila - - 2% 13% 33% 37% 15%
23 ZHANG Ashley - 1% 7% 24% 36% 25% 7%
24 BISONO Valentina - - 3% 14% 33% 35% 14%
25 WILLIAMSON Beatrix - 1% 5% 19% 34% 30% 10%
26 KOVALCHUK Erika S. - 1% 8% 25% 37% 24% 5%
26 WEI Sherry - - 4% 16% 33% 34% 13%
28 NOVOJILOV Anastasia - - - 4% 22% 45% 28%
29 VOSKOV Olivia - - 4% 17% 36% 32% 10%
30 DU Andria 4% 19% 34% 28% 12% 2% -
31 CHEN Allison 1% 10% 32% 36% 17% 4% -
32 LIN Cynthia - 4% 17% 32% 31% 14% 2%
33 IVANOV Angela-Sophie 1% 6% 22% 34% 26% 10% 1%
34 YOUN Emily 2% 13% 31% 33% 17% 4% -
35 LIANG Carina - 2% 11% 29% 36% 19% 4%
36 JUNG Sangeun - - 3% 15% 35% 34% 12%
37 XIAO Katelyn - 2% 13% 31% 34% 17% 3%
38 MISHIMA Audrey - - 2% 13% 34% 38% 12%
39 WONG Sydney - 1% 6% 21% 38% 29% 5%
40 JIANG chenxi - 3% 20% 40% 28% 8% 1%
41 HAN Emma 6% 24% 35% 25% 9% 1% -
42 HSU Catherine 9% 29% 35% 20% 6% 1% -
43 CHEN Sunny 8% 30% 37% 20% 5% 1% -
44 JU Jennifer - 5% 23% 38% 26% 8% 1%
45 XU Mulan 1% 12% 31% 34% 17% 4% -
46 SMOTRITSKY Liat - - 3% 15% 34% 35% 13%
47 BI Michelle 1% 7% 23% 36% 25% 7% 1%
48 CHERNOBRIVETS Maria - 3% 15% 32% 32% 15% 3%
49 REDWINE Louise 30% 42% 22% 6% 1% - -
50 ZHANG Flora 8% 29% 37% 20% 5% 1% -
51 SHEIKH PAREE 1% 5% 19% 33% 29% 11% 1%
51 GOLIYAD Lisa - - 4% 18% 34% 32% 11%
53 YOU Isabel B. - - 3% 15% 34% 34% 13%
54 GARCIA Aly - 4% 17% 34% 32% 12% 1%
55 SONKU Mira 1% 11% 29% 35% 20% 4% -
56 YANAGIDA Coco 2% 14% 33% 33% 15% 3% -
57 BUES Caelan 9% 39% 36% 13% 2% - -
58 ZHENG Erin - 3% 14% 32% 33% 15% 2%
59 MONITTO Malina 3% 17% 34% 31% 13% 2% -
60 TING Evelyn 6% 26% 37% 23% 7% 1% -
61 WU Yutong 1% 7% 23% 36% 26% 7% -
62 YOON Elsa 5% 23% 37% 26% 8% 1% -
63 GOPU Jyothirvida 10% 32% 36% 18% 4% 1% -
64 WARD Imani 5% 22% 35% 27% 10% 2% -
65 JI Susan 17% 38% 31% 11% 2% - -
66 HOWARD Katherine - 5% 20% 36% 28% 9% 1%
67 LOBANOVA Varvara - - 3% 14% 32% 36% 15%
68 SHIN Jamie 1% 10% 30% 35% 19% 5% -
69 CHAKRAPANI Tara 3% 18% 34% 29% 13% 3% -
70 MOLAN Ava 6% 25% 36% 24% 8% 1% -
71 KAMENSKY Elina 2% 14% 31% 33% 16% 4% -
72 ZHANG Chloe Xuan Yu 11% 34% 35% 16% 4% - -
73 VITEVITCH Sophia 13% 39% 33% 12% 2% - -
74 PAREKH Riana 39% 42% 16% 3% - - -
75 MEGGERS Arya 16% 39% 32% 11% 2% - -
76 ZELJKOVIC Anastasija 1% 5% 20% 34% 29% 11% 1%
76 PETRIZZO Anna 1% 16% 41% 32% 10% 1% -
78 HALL Henrietta 5% 39% 40% 14% 2% - -
79 ZHENG Kristen 14% 35% 32% 15% 3% - -
80 TANG Jacquelyn 22% 42% 27% 8% 1% - -
81 GRUDZINSKI Josephine 29% 42% 23% 6% 1% - -
82 CABRERA QUINTANA Lucrecia 77% 21% 2% - - - -
83 SAJJA Anwita 27% 41% 24% 7% 1% - -
84 SHABBIR Aiza 45% 40% 12% 2% - - -
85 WANG Belinda 1% 13% 34% 34% 15% 2% -
86 DING Iris Siyue 6% 25% 38% 23% 7% 1% -
87 DATSON Mia 44% 39% 14% 3% - - -
88 GORE Amina 24% 41% 26% 7% 1% - -
89 KRUG Ally 9% 34% 36% 16% 4% - -
90 WILKENS Lorelei 28% 41% 24% 7% 1% - -
91 ANDERSON Brooke 62% 32% 5% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.