Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHANG Vivian | - | - | - | - | 1% | 21% | 78% |
| 2 | LUO lucy | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% |
| 3 | JOO Sara | - | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 81% |
| 3 | ZHU Audrey | - | - | 2% | 11% | 34% | 41% | 13% |
| 5 | WEN Cynthia | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 39% | 12% |
| 6 | WANG Joann | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 44% | 17% | |
| 7 | ZHU Alivia | - | - | - | 3% | 28% | 68% | |
| 8 | KHETPAL Aalia | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 16% | |
| 9 | KUANG Bella | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 47% | 17% |
| 10 | BYK Karalina | - | - | - | 1% | 25% | 75% | |
| 11 | ELLISON Ingrid | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 44% | 23% | |
| 13 | XING Melly | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 40% |
| 14 | CHAN Jolene | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 40% | 51% |
| 15 | ZHILKOV Anya | - | - | - | 4% | 24% | 60% | 12% |
| 16 | ZHENG Annalyn | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 45% |
| 17 | VO Evelyn | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% | |
| 18 | HAFEZ Sahar | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% | |
| 18 | LIU Bella | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 50% | 11% | |
| 20 | CHUNG Sera | 2% | 20% | 57% | 21% | |||
| 21 | LI Beatrice | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 22 | PAEK Ellie | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% | - |
| 22 | MCCLAIN Madison | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 2% |
| 24 | LI Doreen | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 25 | GOMEZ Amelia | 5% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 26 | JAZWINSKI Ivy | 1% | 8% | 31% | 40% | 18% | 2% | |
| 27 | WANG Sally | 2% | 26% | 43% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 28 | DONG Audrey | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 2% |
| 28 | KIM Lael | 1% | 8% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 3% | - |
| 30 | WANG Allyson | - | 5% | 35% | 60% | |||
| 31 | JU Victoria | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
| 32 | SON Ayoung | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 41% | |
| 33 | LIN Claire | - | - | 1% | 15% | 66% | 18% | |
| 34 | HUANG Gabrielle | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 1% |
| 35 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | - | - | 5% | 22% | 44% | 29% | |
| 36 | ZHU Alicia | 7% | 30% | 42% | 20% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | HUANG Jiayu | 5% | 30% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 38 | ZHENG Rachel | 1% | 11% | 35% | 40% | 12% | 1% | |
| 39 | LU Sophia | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 40 | CLOUD Chrystie | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 41 | MCCLAIN Grayce | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 42 | WANG Manny | - | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 43 | JIN Emily | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 44 | LEE Annabel | 4% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 45 | CHEN Sophie | 2% | 26% | 43% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 46 | WANG Kelly | 5% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 47 | JOVANOVIC Una | 8% | 32% | 41% | 18% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | KIRBY Emelie | 3% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 49 | LEVITE Lilliana | 18% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | NIVAS Tvisha | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 51 | FANG Yining | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 52 | HALL Olivia | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 53 | SUN YOUXI | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 54 | ZELDIN Nina | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 55 | XU Elaina | 29% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | RUPARELIYA Alisha | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 57 | WANG Jacy | 55% | 39% | 6% | - | |||
| 58 | PATEL Tiana | 12% | 40% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 59 | JIN Kerina | 8% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 1% | - | |
| 59 | WANG Heidi | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 61 | SUI Jessie | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 62 | PAN Nina | 29% | 46% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 63 | DOMINIK Eliana | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 64 | POONIA Akira | 30% | 46% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 65 | LAVOIE Cecilia | - | 4% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 6% | |
| 66 | CHANG Paige Yijae | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 67 | TAN Noelle | 22% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 68 | GUTKOVSKIY Chloe | 24% | 56% | 18% | 1% | |||
| 69 | ZHANG Ruozhu | < 1% | 17% | 44% | 32% | 7% | - | - |
| 70 | CHOUDRY Charlotte | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 70 | CHIANG Ellie | 29% | 44% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 70 | WANG Amelia | 82% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 73 | CAO Vivien | 4% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 73 | CLOUD Cailynn | 62% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 75 | KIM Lisel | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 75 | JAIN Adab | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 77 | ANDROSENKO Aleksandra | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.